Looking for feedback before I either write some letters or consider some other form of action.
Yesterday the federal gov't announced a 9 million plus dollar grant to crown lease land in Alberta, this money sound like it is going to go towards watering system rehab and new fences.
Now heres my concerns with this.We happen to farm and ranch in an area which is not near a crown lease so we have never been able to get any of our animals into one. Instead we have to buy or rent private land and patures to run our livestock on. We also have to repair our own fences and worry about our own watering systems. These costs come out of our operating budget , my question is this , does the monies paid to these leases constitute a form of subsidy to those that use the crown leases and if so would it not stand to reason that they are in fact a trade distorting subsidy within our own country? Is this right? Should we have to compete with our own tax dollars in our own country. The costs of fence and other maintainance on crown leases should be bourne by the costs charged to producers using the crown leases and not shared by other tax paying producers that do not have access to these leases.
A free market is a free market and in a subsdized market all players should have equal access to the subsidies not just a chosen few.
Yesterday the federal gov't announced a 9 million plus dollar grant to crown lease land in Alberta, this money sound like it is going to go towards watering system rehab and new fences.
Now heres my concerns with this.We happen to farm and ranch in an area which is not near a crown lease so we have never been able to get any of our animals into one. Instead we have to buy or rent private land and patures to run our livestock on. We also have to repair our own fences and worry about our own watering systems. These costs come out of our operating budget , my question is this , does the monies paid to these leases constitute a form of subsidy to those that use the crown leases and if so would it not stand to reason that they are in fact a trade distorting subsidy within our own country? Is this right? Should we have to compete with our own tax dollars in our own country. The costs of fence and other maintainance on crown leases should be bourne by the costs charged to producers using the crown leases and not shared by other tax paying producers that do not have access to these leases.
A free market is a free market and in a subsdized market all players should have equal access to the subsidies not just a chosen few.
Comment