• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BSE Cluster area???? new Canadian case

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    BSE Cluster area???? new Canadian case

    posted at ranchers.net on Wednesday an article
    detailing our newest case of BSE in a 6 year old
    black angus cow from "the same general area of
    Alberta home to most of Canada’s BSE activity."
    Alberta's BSE cluster zone.... by the way.... is near
    CFB Wainwright.


    Canada - Case of BSE (Mad cow disease) in 6 year
    old cow

    11 Mar 2010


    The Badger has learned a new case of BSE was
    discovered two weeks ago, but the public was not
    informed as part of the government’s new
    communication strategy.

    The decision not to announce new cases of BSE was
    made in August of 2009 and the public was

    informed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency
    (CFIA) online.

    “The CFIA is committed to providing all
    stakeholders, including the general public, media
    and trading partners, with timely information about
    disease detections in farmed animals. As such, we
    have revised how we report online for disease
    detections in farmed animals to provide a more
    comprehensive view of Canada’s animal health
    status. All confirmed cases of federally reportable
    diseases in farmed animals will be centrally located
    on our website.

    This information will be updated monthly,”
    explained CFIA spokesperson Jenn Gearey.

    The new communication strategy means journalists
    will not be notified when any new cases of BSE are
    discovered.

    The latest finding of BSE – Canada’s 17th domestic
    case – was announced to industry stakeholders
    such as processors on Feb. 25, but not to the media
    or general public. And while the CFIA claims its
    reportable diseases page will be updated monthly,
    no new information has been posted since Jan. 31.

    The infection was detected through the national
    surveillance program in a six-year-old black angus
    cow in the same general area of Alberta home to
    most of Canada’s BSE activity.

    The last case discovered in Canada was in May of
    2009 – the only occurrence that year. In 2008, there
    were four incidents, in 2007, there were three and
    in 2006, there were five cases of BSE.

    Canada’s international risk status has not been
    affected by the latest case.

    end article....



    Canada mad cow case delays OIE status change

    Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:26pm EST


    WINNIPEG, Manitoba (Reuters) - Canada has
    confirmed its 17th case of mad cow disease, a
    finding that will delay any upgrade to its
    international risk status by one year, a top industry
    official said on Wednesday. The animal was born in
    February 2004, making it Canada's latest-born
    case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).
    The new case pushes back the earliest date for an
    upgrade to Canada's controlled risk status from the
    World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) to 2016,
    said Ted Haney, president of the Canada Beef
    Export Federation.

    A country cannot apply to upgrade to negligible
    status sooner than 11 years after the latest-born
    case of BSE. The process then takes about one year.

    Canada, along with many other countries with
    controlled risk status from the OIE, can ship beef as
    long as it meets conditions such as disease
    surveillance.

    The infected animal, which has been slaughtered,
    has not affected trade, Haney said.

    The 2003 discovery of the first case of mad cow
    disease on a Canadian farm caused many countries
    to halt imports of Canadian beef. Most markets
    have since reopened, but the cattle industry
    remains in a slump due to other factors such as a
    strong Canadian dollar.

    Mad cow disease is believed to be spread when
    cattle eat protein rendered from the brains and
    spines of infected cattle or sheep. Canada banned
    that practice in 1997.

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency tightened
    feed rules further in 2007 and said the moves
    should help eliminate the disease nationally within
    a decade, although the agency cautioned it still
    expected to discover the occasional new case.

    CFIA spokeswoman Julie LePage confirmed the 17th
    case but could not provide details of the new case.

    The CFIA notified cattle industry officials of the new
    case late last month, but did not issue a news
    release, Haney said.

    (Reporting by Rod Nickel, editing by Julie
    Ingwersen)

    © Thomson Reuters 2010 All rights reserved.


    http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCAT
    RE6295A420100310

    Sorry if this is upsetting to some of you, as Kato has
    already pointed out at ranchers. I find this to be
    revealing and important to, once again, have a case
    born after the feed bans. I suspect though that
    most people will (like in the UK) go for decades
    blaming some remnant of old feed in a bin yadda
    yatta....

    When we open up our minds to the more obvious
    truth, that so-called prion infected feed was not/is
    not responsible for BSE in Canada... we will finally
    move onto unravelling the true cause.

    I am still waiting for Leon Benoit's MP office and the
    Dept of National Defence to respond to my inquiry
    into why CFB Wainwright has been attempting to
    expand its land-base without any EIS
    environmental impact study, and why after making
    some apparent land deals, and angering those
    ranchers that don't want to sell out, they are now
    claiming that they will not be going ahead with the
    base expansion plans.

    CFB Wainwright being Canada's main tank training
    facility, reportedly bought land from my new
    neighbour in the Chauvin area. This is not, as far
    as I am aware, anywhere near the present borders
    of the base. It, is however, an area of very high oil
    and gas activity, and Alberta's primary CWD
    hotspot, where last year they slaughter and buried
    hundreds of deer after they shot them from a
    helicopter.

    In accordance with the new Alberta Animal Health
    Act, I for one, want to know what is the status of
    cattle from this area.... are the surrounding
    ranchers facing a "control zone", "Surveillance
    zone", or a "quarantine zone"..... or what?

    #2
    So what is our cfia listing as the cause of these BSE cases, no wonder other countries are hesitant if we cannot admit what looks like the obvious. What do you cattlemen believe is the cause, feed in the past may have been one but what about now? Pretty poor handling of this issue if you ask me.

    Comment


      #3
      I think for the CWB to have even a slight chance of getting production down to what they can sell they should drop the PRO on HRS by about $2.50/bus. Durum should be $0.10 /bushel NET for next year.
      The only chance They have to get a "premium" for farmers is to limit Canadian production to 90% of what they think they can sell.
      A contract system in the spring to sign up the tonnes needed to cover expected sales is also needed.
      If farmers want to grow more than they contract for they would have to store it and contract it out on future years.

      Comment


        #4
        No smart farmer puts any value in the PRO so why do you think putting a $2.50 or $0.10 price would have any significant effect. If we knew the mandate of the CWB ie. maximize $/bu or sell all production, then the PRO may become a little more useful. Better yet, give us choice to deal with whomever so we can plan for price, delivery, cash flow, etc. Supporters, please don't tell me that a FPC gives me choice because in most years the CWB skims profits off of those using that program to subsidize the pool (unless hypothetically they make a blunder and then they just recoup it over a number of years...oh wait....that actually happened).

        Comment


          #5
          The 90% contracting thing is a great idea for a monopoly CWB because it would even muzzle dissidents even more. CWB offers to take X tonnes over the year, farmers come in hand with 1.5 x X tonnes looking for a contract. CWB picks their supporters first and then the fence sitters and so on. Vocal non-supporters get nothing, can't sell any of their production other than to the feed market because they live in the designated area, don't get a vote in the next election because they quit growing wheat. The CWB could put in a first come lottery to make it "fair" but that concept fell flat on its face once already.

          Comment


            #6
            The CWB just playing games again. Piss off the farmers into growing less wheat. Piss off the farmers so they haul the wheat into the feed market as they know farmers need money. Have a token interm payment at a critical time, maybe at seeding, make it look like they are really looking after you. Give you a final payment 18 months later, and say the CWB returned a higher price. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

            Comment


              #7
              What kind of a world are we comming to? Stakeholders are notified of diseases but not the public. What about the thousands of us who have everything we own invested in beef production? Don't we qualify as stakeholders? This notification policy stinks. If anyone knows about disease we all should know. This new practice invites the worst kind of insider trading.

              Comment


                #8
                Do you remember the loss on discretionary trading?

                The fund has been repaid and that didn't just magically appear.

                Besides in a time where all other prices are tanking doesn't that cwb blanket make you feel all warm and fuzzy and broke? wink wink nudge nudge.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Current CWRS initial payments are somewhere in the range of 75 to 80 percent of the CWB PRO so not a lot of room (at least I suspect from the CWB and the federal government side). My memory could be faulty but it seems as if the target is to have your adjusted initial payment at 80 % or so of the forecast final.

                  On thing that would be nice would be to give higher grade/protein CWRS an increase to bring initial payment spreads back into line with the PRO forecasts (which I assume are market based). Everyone should be making sure they deliver mid grade/low protein against their fixed payment contracts (lock in the spread) and leave high protein wheat in the pool.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It's very frustrating, to say the least, especially for those of us who are not from Alberta. It makes you wonder what the heck is going on?

                    Have they said anything about whether this one was the variant strain?

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The fpc does give you an option to use if you so desire. Last march you could have locked in cwrs at 7.85 bu. but you were probably finding too much wrong with the program to act.IMHO.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Will agree on your comment on using CWB programs. the $6.85/bu was only available for about one day (converted futures $300 with a $50/tonne CWB deductions). If you want to go the high and the best basis $25 over, a farmer had a chance at $7.50/bu.

                        I have to express frustation on the latter comment about using the programs wothout question and perhaps suggesting they are a privelege the CWB grants some farmers. Will note that in 2009/10, CWRS basis levels have varied from $15 under to $25 with absolutely no relationship to the market. Whatever relationship there is in place, it is for the CWB board of directors to allocate funds and for the operations side to manage risk. Have to comment on frustration in the 2008/09 annual report where PPO wider basis was use to transfer money back to the pricing pools (one year out of sync) and to bring the contingency fund back into the black.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          [URL="http://www.cwb.ca/public/en/farmers/producer/historical/pdf/2009-10/2009-10fpcbpccharts.pdf"]historical pricing[/URL]

                          See graphs 6 and 13.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Pardon me for not keeping a record of happenings in this world. However if I remember right we still don't have any REAL science proving the source of BSE, only theory.
                            If that’s so - here’s mine. B SE has been around as long as cows have been around. We just didn’t know what to call it, nor did we have the labs and testing tools to find it (if indeed we knew what it was)!
                            Therefore it’s time we called an “ace an ace and a spade a spade” and the govt. should shut the borders to anything of shore or from across the 49th. until all countries agree to a science.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Agree on the junk science wd40 but how does closing the borders help? we are still net exporters so it would hurt us more than anyone else.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...