I want to share this with my fellow ranchers, so you
can make informed decisions about your health.
No, this is not beef production concerns; I hope
you'll look at the links below:
The British Medical Journal recently published a
report outlining an investigation into the WHO and
the H1N1 pandemic - and - the financial links
between those advising the WHO and the same
pharmaceutical companies that profited from the
scenario.
http://www.infowars.com/new-british-medical-
journal-report-questions-legitimacy-of-h1n1-
pandemic/
There is a Fox news video at this link to watch. A
medical representative from the featured USA
county points out in his statement that "H1N1 will
be in this coming years "seasonal flu shot".
When you read the manufacturers pamphlets re
past "seasonal" flu shots - it was evident that a
form of the H1N1 was already in the seasonal flu
vaccine. However, what is going to be different
this time, is the H1N1 in the new 2010 seasonal flu
vaccine will (in my thoughts) be manufactured
using Dr. J. Craig Venters synthetic DNA
techniques.
Dr. J. Craig Venter stated in an Aljazeera interview
(several weeks ago just after the news reported on
his labs successful development of synthetic DNA),
he blurted out this statement at the end of the
interview (and I watched this myself).... that "we
could see this technology in next years flu shot".
Dr. Venter stated the technology has been around
for 15 years. His lab was able to synthesize (visa a
reverse engineering technique) DNA from the four
chemicals known to be the building blocks of DNA.
However, what is not well explained is this:
- pre-existing yeast/bacteria cells were used to
assemble (piece together) DNA fragments, and
- the artificially manufactured DNA was inserted
into pre-existing living cells, which researchers
claimed to removed the "natural" DNA from, before
they implanted the synthetic DNA.
What I find interesting, is that according to some
websites, Dr. Venter's lab utilized "ionizing
radiation resistant bacteria" to assist in this whole
process. (Deinococcus radiodurans is one example
of this type of bacteria).
(Wikipedia - Deinococcus radiodurans:
"Deinococcus has been genetically engineered for
use in bioremediation to consume and digest
solvents and heavy metals, even in a highly
radioactive site. For example, the bacterial mercuric
reductase gene has been cloned from Escherichia
coli into Deinococcus to detoxify the ionic mercury
residue frequently found in radioactive waste
generated from nuclear weapons manufacture.[22]
Those researchers developed a strain of
Deinococcus that could detoxify both mercury and
toluene in mixed radioactive wastes.
The Craig Venter Institute has used a system
derived from the rapid DNA repair mechanisms of
D. radiodurans to assemble synthetic DNA
fragments into chromosomes, with the ultimate
goal of producing a synthetic organism they call
Mycoplasma laboratorium.[23]"(end wiki)
An important feature of these "ionization" resistant
forms of bacteria is that their special proteins
protect them/and their DNA from damage. Dr.
Michael Daly found that these bacteria were high in
"manganese" based proteins. This radio-resistant
family of bacteria is capable of repairing DNA single
and double strand breaks (even after exposure to
massive doses of gamma radiation). What came
first, the chicken or the egg, question comes to
mind. How does it repair the DNA (or re-assemble
it) without a blue print (intact DNA/rNA) to work
with?
Its pretty complex stuff, but, I find the more I learn
about the Genetically Modified stuff in our society
the more questions I have. Like: Monsanto utilizes
a "radio-resistant" bacterial gene in their "Roundup
Ready" crops. What bacteria is used? and what
gene? and what safety testing is done to ensure that
this genetic material isn't "re-assembling DNA"
fragments in these plants (creating hitherto
unknown or un-natural proteins, or molecules in
these plants).
How this relates to the H1N1 vaccine. Dr. Venter
did state that his synthetic DNA technology will
likely be used in this coming years seasonal flu
vaccine. Since the testing of the past H1N1 vaccine
was based on a different strain of the virus than
was actually circulating, we will not know the
potential side-effects of 2010's seasonal flu shot,
IF the viral-DNA is synthetic and assembled using
Venter's techniques - we could be faced with the
largest human medical experiment in history.
#that is, if we haven't already been exposed visa
our vaccines to this technology. Apparently, we
have been exposed already via our food.
Another article found at infowars.com by Mike
Adams "the Health Ranger" can be read here: http://www.infowars.com/who-scandal-exposed-
advisors-received-kickbacks-from-h1n1-vaccine-
manufacturers/
can make informed decisions about your health.
No, this is not beef production concerns; I hope
you'll look at the links below:
The British Medical Journal recently published a
report outlining an investigation into the WHO and
the H1N1 pandemic - and - the financial links
between those advising the WHO and the same
pharmaceutical companies that profited from the
scenario.
http://www.infowars.com/new-british-medical-
journal-report-questions-legitimacy-of-h1n1-
pandemic/
There is a Fox news video at this link to watch. A
medical representative from the featured USA
county points out in his statement that "H1N1 will
be in this coming years "seasonal flu shot".
When you read the manufacturers pamphlets re
past "seasonal" flu shots - it was evident that a
form of the H1N1 was already in the seasonal flu
vaccine. However, what is going to be different
this time, is the H1N1 in the new 2010 seasonal flu
vaccine will (in my thoughts) be manufactured
using Dr. J. Craig Venters synthetic DNA
techniques.
Dr. J. Craig Venter stated in an Aljazeera interview
(several weeks ago just after the news reported on
his labs successful development of synthetic DNA),
he blurted out this statement at the end of the
interview (and I watched this myself).... that "we
could see this technology in next years flu shot".
Dr. Venter stated the technology has been around
for 15 years. His lab was able to synthesize (visa a
reverse engineering technique) DNA from the four
chemicals known to be the building blocks of DNA.
However, what is not well explained is this:
- pre-existing yeast/bacteria cells were used to
assemble (piece together) DNA fragments, and
- the artificially manufactured DNA was inserted
into pre-existing living cells, which researchers
claimed to removed the "natural" DNA from, before
they implanted the synthetic DNA.
What I find interesting, is that according to some
websites, Dr. Venter's lab utilized "ionizing
radiation resistant bacteria" to assist in this whole
process. (Deinococcus radiodurans is one example
of this type of bacteria).
(Wikipedia - Deinococcus radiodurans:
"Deinococcus has been genetically engineered for
use in bioremediation to consume and digest
solvents and heavy metals, even in a highly
radioactive site. For example, the bacterial mercuric
reductase gene has been cloned from Escherichia
coli into Deinococcus to detoxify the ionic mercury
residue frequently found in radioactive waste
generated from nuclear weapons manufacture.[22]
Those researchers developed a strain of
Deinococcus that could detoxify both mercury and
toluene in mixed radioactive wastes.
The Craig Venter Institute has used a system
derived from the rapid DNA repair mechanisms of
D. radiodurans to assemble synthetic DNA
fragments into chromosomes, with the ultimate
goal of producing a synthetic organism they call
Mycoplasma laboratorium.[23]"(end wiki)
An important feature of these "ionization" resistant
forms of bacteria is that their special proteins
protect them/and their DNA from damage. Dr.
Michael Daly found that these bacteria were high in
"manganese" based proteins. This radio-resistant
family of bacteria is capable of repairing DNA single
and double strand breaks (even after exposure to
massive doses of gamma radiation). What came
first, the chicken or the egg, question comes to
mind. How does it repair the DNA (or re-assemble
it) without a blue print (intact DNA/rNA) to work
with?
Its pretty complex stuff, but, I find the more I learn
about the Genetically Modified stuff in our society
the more questions I have. Like: Monsanto utilizes
a "radio-resistant" bacterial gene in their "Roundup
Ready" crops. What bacteria is used? and what
gene? and what safety testing is done to ensure that
this genetic material isn't "re-assembling DNA"
fragments in these plants (creating hitherto
unknown or un-natural proteins, or molecules in
these plants).
How this relates to the H1N1 vaccine. Dr. Venter
did state that his synthetic DNA technology will
likely be used in this coming years seasonal flu
vaccine. Since the testing of the past H1N1 vaccine
was based on a different strain of the virus than
was actually circulating, we will not know the
potential side-effects of 2010's seasonal flu shot,
IF the viral-DNA is synthetic and assembled using
Venter's techniques - we could be faced with the
largest human medical experiment in history.
#that is, if we haven't already been exposed visa
our vaccines to this technology. Apparently, we
have been exposed already via our food.
Another article found at infowars.com by Mike
Adams "the Health Ranger" can be read here: http://www.infowars.com/who-scandal-exposed-
advisors-received-kickbacks-from-h1n1-vaccine-
manufacturers/
Comment