No Scanning by Alberta Auction Mkts

[Happytrails]

I have it from a good source that the Alta Auctions Mkt Assn is refusing to scan and report RFID movements through their facilities. Don't know how the government will react. I think the auctions should be prepared to close their doors if penalties are threatened. That would promptly bring things to a head. And those of us who agree with their stand had better show it. HT

PS. FYI the CFIA rep at the meeting with the auction mkts barely spoke English and left for Montreal half way though to attend a picnic. Maybe a slight lack of interest in our concerns?

[grassfarmer]

I don't think the auctions should bear the cost of scanning and reporting movements either. Time to tell the Government to dig in their pocket and pay for it - they have already done it for the packers so why not for the auctions?

[smcgrath76]

I agree GF. Even though I see the
potential for an auction to profit in the
short term by offering a value added
service, by making a program national or
provincial and forcing it, there is no
potential market advantage. If this is
the approach then Gov't should step up and
pay.

[ProFarmer]

What are we going to gain by scaning cattle at the auction, except giving some candyass pencil pusher a job..

[grassfarmer]

Traceability.

[Happytrails]

Apparently some of us have failed to understand that the government is us and to make the government pay is the same as make us pay. If the costs to the industry are greater than the benefits then plans to scan at auction markets and other intermediate locations should be scrapped.

[grassfarmer]

The packers clearly don't have any qualms about making us (the tax payers) pay for their scanning equipment so why should the auction marts?

[ProFarmer]

Do you think the average consumer really cares about being able to trace a tag or getting the cheapest chunk of meat so she has money left to run her SUV.

[smcgrath76]

I think the biggest reason that
government should pay if they choose to
implement this system...
Traceability is to protect us (the
public)
If we (the public) want this measure, we
(the public) should pay for it.
I know that means we pay through taxes,
etc. but the cost share between the few
thousand of we (the producer) versus a
few million of we (the public) is a
significant difference.
We (the producer) may not have much
choice about having some of these things
forced on us.

[grassfarmer]

Profarmer - absolutely, the Canadian consumer has never been more concerned about knowing the source of their food. I have built a beef direct retailing business based on that fact - they want to know and trust the producer of their food (traceability)and price is of little or no concern to them. Too many cattle producers confuse the low prices and demand they get for their cattle at auction or the packers yards with a low demand from consumers - big difference.