• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CAEPLA and Keith Wilson

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    CAEPLA and Keith Wilson

    The banana republic of Alberta. A must listen

    Part 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhEKgiQOl64

    Part 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iob7tYf47J4

    #2
    MLA's Morton, Groeneveld and Berger are at the Memorial Centre in High River at 10 am on Saturday the 12th to debunk the myths as George puts it. Should prove to be an interesting time.

    Comment


      #3
      George! Who would trust anything that came out of his mouth! This was the guy that very undemocratically pulled the rug out from well funded organizations whose members largely consisted of LAND OWNERS. The stockgrowers that stood alongside George in his quest to destroy the potential power these organizations held, well, you reap what you sow.

      Comment


        #4
        Someone from town met with Jack Hayden
        regarding the bills and was told, "Now do you really
        think we (the PCs) would do anything to jeapardize
        the next election?"

        Well frankly, Mr. Hayden.... duh!!! I think maybe
        that would be a whopping Yes.

        Perhaps the PCs are so fat and lazy, having been in
        power for the last, what? 42 years, the do need to
        be kicked out on their butts.

        If the Land Stewardship Act were so good and
        perfect, why the need for a bill to amend it and
        clarify it?

        It is not just the one bill that is setting precedent, it
        is the combination of many - and like I've said
        before ... nobody is even looking at the Animal
        Health ACT (passed and proclaimed law) and the
        Animal Health Amendment Act (passed but not yet
        proclaimed) - and its a duzzi! Please give the bums
        hell on my behalf boys and girls.

        Now we have the PCs spending 370 million dollars
        on a new communications system for emergency
        responders because the USA says we aren't
        prepared for a major terrorist attack yadda yadda.
        Now maybe there are a few problems with the
        present system, but aren't we (Alberta) in a major
        deficit again, and don't you think that this system
        could wait for a little while. After all, there aren't
        that many people living in Alberta and the cost (for
        new towers and radios) is pretty high. Not to
        mention, but I'm really sick and tired of all the
        towers dotting the landscape, they are gross and
        dangerous to our health.

        Comment


          #5
          It doesn't matter what the present bozos say (Don't worry, be happy), it's the next power you gotta worry about who may actually be reading and understanding the power these acts give them.

          Comment


            #6
            I heard these three MLAs at the Alberta Beef Industry Conference in Red Deer two weeks ago. I think they did a pretty good job explaining...
            If anything the question should be whether to trust a lawyer...

            Comment


              #7
              Did they read the bills word for word to
              you? If they did a good job of
              explaining, it is simply because they have
              a lot of explaining to do. You can
              download the bills for free at the Queen's
              printer site, and read for yourself.
              There is very little to explain, or
              interpret. It is pretty Black and White.

              Comment


                #8
                Ruken, they had a half an hour to explain something that is rather complicated. Only time for 2 comments and no questions. I assume you never wanted to get any deeper into the subject and choose not to sit with any of the 3 at lunch to clarify any of the changes or non changes. There certainly are some conversations going on right now to clarify from both sides of the conversation. It is a dangerous game not to ask for clarification and accountability on this subject. Even if you have complete faith in the present government, legislation lives on and has to be bullet proof for the next government.

                Comment


                  #9
                  smc and per, I agree with both of you that the thing must be bullet proof. Thats where we come in.

                  And the next government, although she sounds well, and may in fact be well, will not last forever with her present ideologies. No matter what the name of the party,they will all go sideways over time. Thats where we come in...

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Couldn't agree with you more Ruken. I am however still not convinced we are there yet on 36 at least not until Ted and Evan convince me beyond any doubt.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I'd still like someone to clarify what has changed over the last 3 to 10 years. What is the allofasudden motivation to make such sweeping changes?
                      How did we get things done before?
                      Was the world standin still?

                      I think we just need to "follow the money" and find the motivation.

                      I think we'd find a Alberta grown "Watergate".

                      Comment


                        #12
                        wd. It's population growth. Until the oil slow down (which is a short term deal), we were growing faster than fast. In 30 years for now, we would have one chaotic mess if we don't forward plan, which is the basis of much of this legislation. (greater community good vs. individual land owner rights)

                        Comment


                          #13
                          RK that is straight out of Marx and Engels. Did you learn nothing from the last century? HT

                          Comment


                            #14
                            RK - the greater public good is a noble
                            cause, but it is not good when it is
                            gained at the expense of the individual.
                            If the public wants to take and use your
                            land, that is one thing, but denying any
                            compensation or negotiation is less than
                            honourable in my opinion.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I guess I'm old fashioned - I thot principles were cast in concrete, ever lasting, based on rightness not the tied of public opinion.

                              What yer saying is that the majority can walk rough-shod over anyone when subjectively it's the right thing to do.

                              I wonder if there is any country left where one could move that respects the individaual anymore.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...