Anybody didn't see this coming???? LOL
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Election
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
And soooooo thrilled that it's finally
here!!!
Not. Don't know what they think they're
going to prove. It's the same 3 dogs
fighting over the same small bone in the
same old junkyard, instead of looking
around and thinking about how to get out
of the junkyard.
-
My un-western view of politics will probably put me at odds with the rest of the posters on here but I think most people are overlooking the most honest and most sensible possible leader - Duceppe. Now I realise that under the current paradigm it's not a reality for him to lead the country but I think he would make a good leader. He is honest "I will do what is good for Quebec" versus the other three "we'll do what is good for babies, pensioners, single mothers while all the time contradicting that and helping big business interests etc"
I was impressed by Duceppe in the election debates last time around - he seemed to have common sense and realistic ideas how to deal with the issues while the others were involved in a p#$T$ match with each other trying to make smarter comments than the others.
I think to make Canada a better place we need to incorporate Quebec more into the mainstream. I realise their attitude is shaped by their history of sepratist tendancies but if there was a way for Quebec to do well within a more united Canada, and for the whole of Canada to do better as a result wouldn't that be progress? What does it need to get there though? It's easy to say Quebec just needs to drop it's sepratist tendancies but to say that ignores the contribution the rest of Canada makes to Quebec not wanting to be part of a united Canada in the first place. As a Quebecer I would probably feel quite a bit of resentment that although I am a Canadian and pay taxes here in this dual language/culture society there is no chance currently of having the country led by a French speaker prime minister.
Comment
-
Grassfarmer, your post makes as much sense as does the idea that Duceppe, a separatist, can run as a Federal candidate.
While his words may sound good, they carry zero value because he has no hope in h3!! of ever having to act on them.
Of course he puts Quebec's interests first - it is his finger on the trigger that holds us hostage. That does not equate with being a good leader.
Put him in the ring as a true federal candidate and then we will see how well he compares to the rest. As it is, he is under absolutely no pressure to perform.
Comment
-
Try reading my post again Burnt - slower this time. You will see that I already covered the points you raised then some.
Comment
-
Can't imagine why GF chose red neck Alberta when he had a chance to locate in our country's socialist utopia. Or maybe that line of thinking doesn't result in a utopia??
Comment
-
Gf, we have had plenty of french speaking Prime Ministers in the past, more than Anglophones. I have worked in Quebec and it sure isn't a dual language place to be. Our Quebec staff would not speak English to us at all and yes we did do our level best at french including having fluent staff to double check our butchered french. The Bloc has an agenda that is anti Canada and as much as Duceppe is intelligent he is very much Not qualified to even be an MP let alone be our Country's leader.
Comment
-
All I know is a Harper majority is a very scary thing to think about.
And I also know that this campaign is going to be short, and a long long way from sweet. I'll go out on a limb here and predict that we're going to see campaign ads that will push election campaigning to a whole new level of nastiness.
And I also know that there are very few things that make me lose interest faster than attack ads. Give me the remote, I'm out of here.
Comment
-
I don't like Duceppe's agenda, but I
have to admit, like GF, I appreciate his
honesty. Actually, if you believe Dr.
Brinkmann from Guelph, PQ is the best
place in Canada to start farming.
I am not sure any of them deserve our
votes, and I am pretty disgusted at the
tone of things.
The contempt of parliament issue really
bugs me, Ignatieff grates on me, Layton
will break me, and Elizabeth May's ag
policy is non existent.
No one is really addressing the issues
beyond next week, and that is not a good
place to be.
I think there will be a path in the
future for someone with some vision to
strike a pose and lead the way, but I
suspect they will be encumbered by the
legacy of bureaucracy we have created.
Legislation by reaction only solves the
problems of yesterday, too late with
today's ideas.
One thing, if we wind up with another
minority parliament, Harper will get his
budget passed, as no one will want to
non-confidence him so soon after an
election.
Comment
-
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment