Traceability Propaganda

[Happytrails]

The promoters of traceability are still at work. Some examples:

1. ABP has a piece in the last Grass Routes entitled "Quarantining a Beef Feedlot: A Cost-Benefit". No real research, no serious analysis, just politics.

2 Lee Gunderson has an advertorial in the last "Alberta Beef" singing the praises of the aussie traceability program. He doesn't even identify it as advertising but does make sure that the magazine is distanced from Roy Rutledge's opposite views. At least Roy's column got published.

3. And the "you must be joking" award goes to Ag Minister Jack Hayden for claiming that the traceability system helped straighten out cattle mixed up by the flooding in Medicine Hat. Guess the plan is to keep up the bluff at every opportunity. Someone should tell him that cattlepeople have been marking their stock since domestication.

She's a sh** storm folks. If we don't keep pushing for what we want the bureaucrats will take everything we've got. HT

[chalice]

I think we are on the same page HT. I am all for traceability so long as it remains my choice. If it remains my choice, I can control the costs and realize a profit for the extra time, money and effort.
We have always had traceability in one form or another because we were able to get rid of TB and Bangs. This "new" traceability is just reinventing the wheel but it would be much better left up to entrepeneurs rather than bureaucrats.

[BTOfarmallll]

He Who Gives up Freedom, for Security, Deserves Neither.........

[Kathy]

So how many guys have run to their local stores and received their FREE RFID tags??? Hmmm.... free from direct cash cost, but not free - in fact, when the government pays for the tags... they own them! and subsequently, they own all the information attached to them.

Hence, you the producer who "got the tags for free" have sold to the government your propriatory information for nothing.

This manner of business allows the government to then share the information attached to the tags with those who have purchased your animals, such as they (government and CCIA) have been doing since the beginning of the traceability program... without lawful permission, and to no direct benefit of the primary producer.

Also, note, the May Census will be upon us again... and government will tell you another lie, that it is the law to fill it in. Not true! You are required by law to give your name and address (for election purposes), and as far as the "farmer census", checking the box indicating you are a farmer is sufficient.

Stop being a push over and fight like a man.

[cpallett]

31. Every person who, without lawful excuse,

(a) refuses or neglects to answer, or wilfully answers falsely, any question requisite for obtaining any information sought in respect of the objects of this Act or pertinent thereto that has been asked of him by any person employed or deemed to be employed under this Act, or

(b) refuses or neglects to furnish any information or to fill in to the best of his knowledge and belief any schedule or form that the person has been required to fill in, and to return the same when and as required of him pursuant to this Act, or knowingly gives false or misleading information or practises any other deception thereunder is, for every refusal or neglect, or false answer or deception, guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or to both.

[riders2010]

Gee, I guess I am gonna have to stop growing pineapples on my farm. lol lol

[per]

You would have to be a Toronto Lawyer to read all that fine print. LOL Thanks by the way for your efforts cpallet.

[per]

Sorry about the missing t.

[cpallett]

Well per, as I read it you are liable for up to three months in jail or a fine of up to $500 for each question on the general census or the Census of Agriculture that you refuse to answer 'without lawful excuse' (and no, I don't know exactly what that means).

If you don't believe me, check out section 31 of the Statistics Act. Just thought everybody might like a heads up as to what the statute actually says about failing to answer census questions.

[Happytrails]

When I was in school 40 years ago totalitarianism was a bad thing. Why are we letting it happen today? I keep going back to the judge's decision in Sadie's case. The language of our rulers curls my hair. Sadie escaped thru the narrowest of cracks.