• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bred cow prices

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    We do not allow landlords to make ANY decisions whether or not it is a cash/crop/or modified rental agreement. Nothing I hate worse than someone else thinking they know whats good for my biz. Eerily similar to my feeling on the CWB.

    Comment


      #22
      Even the cash renting Landlord? Or just the crop share landlord?

      Comment


        #23
        The standard chant in the debate is that farmers should decide. A landlord is not a farmer yet is continully grouped as a farmer when they tally the votes. At the same time those farmers outside the board do not get a vote. Does one have more of a vested interest in the outcome than the other. You could claim American's who do business in Canada have a vested interest in the outcome of a federal election but we don't allow them to vote in our election.

        Comment


          #24
          I am not considered a farmers by the
          CWB since i have not had a permit
          book since 2007.

          Comment


            #25
            1500 head in 25 minutes? How big were the lots?

            Comment


              #26
              Ya they got to lot 9 and they were done. So 9
              divided by 1500 is 166. DLMS was
              thanking/apologizing local buyers for comming
              out and thanked them for bidding.

              I did this at a small farm/acreage sale this
              summer, they had 10 lots of new fence posts
              high bidder on first bundle could take 1 bundle or
              as many as they wanted, I took all 10 cost me
              $3000 but I saved $500 from the local Ufa price
              17% discount

              Comment


                #27
                Only the ones that are forced to sign a contract should be the ones allowed to vote. It may result in a few real farmers not being able to vote but would make it so an awfull lot of non farmers do not get to vote.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Reading over your post about fear of debt kato reminded me of my long past grandmother. Annie in 1985 had $50,000 in the bank and her pension paid her lodge expenses and gave her a little money left over. She worried for days if she had should spend a little and get her hair done? Thankfully mom assured her she should go for it!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    I'm not so surprised that bred heifers seem to be over supplied, the country seems to be full of them. Problem is two fold - one: many of the bigger scale cow/calf guys that are serious about staying in the business longterm rear their own replacement heifers.

                    and two: many of the heifers for sale are not the result of any type of breeding program - they are just heifers with 4 legs and a tail. A lot of the guys selling them are looking for an easy way to run cattle - buy female calves/yearlings and run them with a bull hoping to double their money, don't have the hassle of calving cows that way.
                    It's a changing dynamic just now for sure and I would think there will be way less heifers retained for replacements this winter by opportunists looking to sell them as breds.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      As a new entity, the cwb will be able to deal in any crop. So maybe the vote should have included all farmers, not just those with a cwb number.

                      Maybe that is why the government used their mandate instead of the cwb select voters list.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...