Premier Redford summoned by Bilderberg

[grassfarmer]

I would suggest the answer lies somewhere in
between the extremes you quote ASRG. I agree with
Sean on this one but the climate change proponents
did themselves a huge disservice with the dodgy
email scandal in England. If you go over to the
commodity forum you would be absolutely ridiculed
for suggesting that there is such a thing as human
influenced climate change. I think many have thrown
the baby out with the bathwater - whatever the exact
cause of climate change the general
recommendations to counter it being suggested a
decade ago still would be wise to implement. We have
got to become more sustainable in the way we live,
less reliant on fossil fuels. We cannot continue this
SUV culture in North America where people are using
5-6 litre trucks/SUVs as single passenger vehicles.
We need to price fuel substantially higher as a
deterrent and that will have a negative affect on farm
incomes but I feel it is a necessary evil.

[ASRG]

I do agree there needs to be some changes.

I have some problems with adding a lot of costs to food production without some mechanism to keep that very production profitable? If we add large extra costs to Canadian food production, we might make that very production obsolete......do we then turn around and buy food from places that have no environmental protections?

The other problem I have with higher costs to reduce GHG is this: Will the government actually use these "taxes and offsets" to actually do anything, or will they just take the money and waste it? Will the extra money just go back to their corporate pals?

If GHG is such a problem why do we see so few incentives for things like solar/hydrogen cells/geothermal? All kinds of incentives for unconventional gas and oil (royalty reductions and holidays, C02 enhanced oil production for free) and yet little to help average Albertans really come up with practical solutions to their own dependence on fossil fuels?

[grassfarmer]

I should maybe have said "have a negative effect on
farm production costs" rather than farm income . You
are right - there is no way we should automatically be
expected to absorb this cost increase without some
compensation from the market place. I'm not sure
what the mechanism to deliver that would be -
especially with two levels of Government in the
pockets of the conventional energy sector companies.
This is reflected in the way alternative energy is
priced if you decide to set up a solar system or
windmill with hopes of selling your surplus to the
national grid. Instead of always being paid the lowest
possible price for your clean energy you should
always be paid the highest. This simple legislative
change makes all the difference to green generation.
Germany does that and one day a couple of weeks
ago their solar production hit a new peak of 22
gigawatts - as much as 20 nuclear power plants
produce running flat out. We get so much more sun
here the potential is huge.

[Kathy]

change computer models have already been shown to be inaccurate. We live on a planet that spins on its axis, and orbits its SUN, and wobbles in wonky ways (on its axis) while it does this. We have control on pollution, but CO2 is not pollution, it is a building block of plants - which we need to survive.

The fact that C02 is named "enemy-number-one" by the globalists and the corporate backed funding mechanism for all these scientific papers... should tell us all a message. If there is anything to be said about what gets published and what doesn't, then if the evidence is stacked to support "man-made" climate change, then I am suspicious to start....

The technology we have seen in our lives, demonstrates that man IS manipulating the weather; but not in the manner that the media reports (ie end of times climate change due to C02 emissions)... but the technology to control the placement of the jet stream, to control the direction of a hurricane, to suppress and induce rain....all exist and we blindly go about our lives with no personal effort to understand these things.... If you want Big Brother to take care of you, expect to get the crap beat out of you - and expect the short end of the stick.

There are some references in this Alex Jones video to how the spectar of "man-made" climate change is to be used to control us and tax us to levels of poverty leading to an early grave.

[Kathy]

Here is Premier Alison Redfords "Final Report" on her attendance at the Bilderberg Conference 2012:

http://www.international.alberta.ca/documents/International/VirginiaWashingtonDC-31May3June2012.pdf

[Kathy]

Here is Premier Alison Redfords "Final Report" on her attendance at the Bilderberg Conference 2012:

http://www.international.alberta.ca/documents/International/VirginiaWashingtonDC-31May3June2012.pdf

[Kathy]

Here is Premier Alison Redfords "Final Report" on her attendance at the Bilderberg Conference 2012:

http://www.international.alberta.ca/documents/International/VirginiaWashingtonDC-31May3June2012.pdf

[Kathy]

Here is Premier Alison Redfords "Final Report" on her attendance at the Bilderberg Conference 2012:

http://www.international.alberta.ca/documents/International/VirginiaWashingtonDC-31May3June2012.pdf