• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Late Weaning

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I'd be prepared to wager that you would challenge any thought in any human mind including your own grassfarmer...LOL What would we do without you...

    First off, why not select genetically and use butterfat to increase rib eye size ---- per hundred pounds.

    Secondly, why would you think that it is antagonistic to select for rib eye size vs butterfat?

    Rib eye size is only a benefit if we have any customers left that would like to eat a rib eye steak rather than all the burger we are producing these days on carcasses that are built for lean yield supported by implants and beta agonists.

    Could you imagine the effect that this could have on our industry if even a few of us put it into practice. 10% is a lot of increased rib eye area, and that was only our one little unsupported experiment.

    One last point about the maternal breed comment. I personally don't believe that there is room in an efficient and implant/ractopamine free industry for maternal AND paternal selection. Once again, I believe this is a choice based on profit from gain alone, rather than quality and efficiency of the cow herd. A feminine cow bred to a masculine bull will always produce a quality carcass animal. Crossbred or purebred. It's natural.... LOL

    Comment


      #12
      Bucket, our crop has little to do with
      actual trade.

      Comment


        #13
        Just had another 1.5" in 10 minutes with 100KPH wind and lots of penny size hail... getting closer to zero bu every storm.
        Water unreal!
        Never seen such fury in all my years.

        Comment


          #14
          Think it through Randy - your same cows/ different
          years/different feeding protocol resulted in a 10%
          increase in rib eye area scan results on the bulls. You
          were not changing the bulls genetically you were
          changing them by feeding them butterfat - there will
          be no genetic difference in the offspring of the bulls.
          Indeed leaving calves on the mothers may be masking
          your ability to select the ones with genetically higher
          rib-eye areas.
          I didn't say that it was antagonistic to select for ribeye
          vs butterfat. I said that i would wager that ribeye area
          and butterfat will be antagonistic traits - there is a
          difference. Isn't meat always antagonistic to milk?
          Think dairy cows versus beef cow at opposite ends of
          the spectrum.

          I say for efficient production with or without
          implants/ractopamines there has always got to be
          room for maternal AND paternal selection. Through
          mating the two strains the highest levels of efficiency
          are achieved. As far as selection in a maternal or
          commercial cattle herd is concerned don't forget the
          old maxim:
          In overall economic importance, fertility is five times
          more important than the growth traits and ten times
          more important than carcass traits.

          Keep the carcass selection for the Charolais and Limo
          bulls/breeds, select the maternal cows to be cows.

          Comment


            #15
            It is some awful scary weather and harvest
            is a long way away!

            Comment


              #16
              Think about it this way GF... if Randy's experiment is true than would it not mean that the calves that are late weaned will have better carcass qualities regardless...put is simpler the late weaned calves were better able to express their genetic potential .. I thought what Gerald Fry said sometimes was BS but the old boy has some good points... I would also believe part of the equation is the bypass protein and not just butterfat.

              Comment


                #17
                2 GD inches in this storm. Come on enough
                is enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                No hail but wheat is lodged from one end
                to the other. UGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
                water water every where.

                Comment


                  #18
                  I recall the Manitoba Canola Growers AGM in Brandon in March, where I met a bunch of young farmers from Saskatchewan who told me that farming was up, up and away with no looking back and no need of fear. Honestly.
                  (I knew it was complete, unadulterated BS, but I just had to share)

                  Comment


                    #19
                    SF3 what clouds were over you! Regina North
                    was just black. 30 degree days and SE wind
                    means get ready. How much rain did you get?
                    We heard a tornado touched down on Number
                    one highway at Balgonie. No details available?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Environment Canada shows 30 degrees by
                      weekend again.

                      In about 1992 (hope my memory is correct) we
                      were harvesting Lentils, 100 degrees, fire trucks
                      following combines. My son and I had to goto
                      Yorkton for a couple of days, Came back to
                      frozen crops, Augst 18. Lentils in swath
                      downgraded badly. Standing, totally fried.

                      The joys of farming. This year full moon is August
                      31? but that hasn't mean't anything last few
                      years.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...