• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EID Readers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Allfarmer---You are right. After the heavy but exciting work in Dec & Jan getting the word out across Saskatchewan about a Pasture Patron meeting in Saskatoon that was very successfull on Jan 23 2013 some people were able to escape for a 1 week rest.

    Heifers are bagging up so just came in from the morning check.

    15455---you are correct. In the last 4 years and through all this RFID, Scanning, unknown laws, fine threats many of my neighbors that were in the cattle business just threw up their hands and left the business. Past chairman of the CCIA were on the news giving FALSE PROPAGANDA statements regarding the RFID eartag. Back in 2009 & 2010 many were PFRA pasture patrons. that just threw up their hands and said "THE COWS ARE GOING DOWN THE ROAD". There comments were "WHAT THE FXXX is coming next". Scanning and retagging every time we move the cattle around. FINES now. What Button Gestapo will be stopping trucks and looking in to see if tags are missing in my animals in the trailer??

    The history for those of us in PFRA pastures were you got into a pasture with a 10 head allotment. Kept applying each year and slowly with a 2 head increase or so built up your allotment to about 30 head. Suddenly the phone calls came from the pasture managers. We need more cattle. Do you want 25 head increase or total up to your maximum quota. Why? The first wave of Pasture patrons baled out of the business.

    Back to my case in 2010. CFIA is not the enemy. It is the CCIA (with fat headed cattlemen sitting at the board level) and the CCA and SCA and other cattlemen groups that are the enemy.

    CFIA was "foolish" to show up in that court room that day. They could of made me spend time and $$$ on my own research and submit prefiled evidence like I did in Triplicate to meet the dead-lines leading up to the case.

    Learning from my years with SAPL and From CAEPLA when one goes into a hearing against a pipeline company "GIANT" that one does not expect to win the outcome of the hearing. Be prepared to go into a hearing, spend your own time and effort, be your own legal counsel, learn along the way but the hearing is usually not in your favor. BUT. It is a path for others to follow and it can be written about for years to come and put in the media.

    Surprisely I won my case, But CFIA or the cattlemen groups in part of the 3 stooges act forgot to do one thing.

    Offer cost recovery, CFIA in the Anaplasmosis case in BC paid huge $$ to certain ranches but there was a "Gag Clause". In my case NO APOLOGY and No COST RECOVERY. So this story will keep popping up as long as I own the cow.

    Today IMHO I watch the same personnel that appear/or are the government advisors to both the Federal and Provincial Ministers of AG. They are the same frontrunners in how the PFRA pastures divesting process appears to be taking place. Little thought process in place and so many little operators (mixed farmers) in my area are threatened to be pushed out of the cattle business. WHY? So many jobs lost which means young families in many rural communities now at risk.

    THERE IS AN OLD SAYING. "you want to keep your friends close" "But you want to keep your enemies even closer"

    Comment


      #12
      And these folks are the reasons we have a backwards
      looking beef industry where producers will always be
      price takers and not price setters.
      No vision - no ambition.
      We have the tools today that would allow the
      consumer to scan a steak before purchase with their
      iPhone and pull up the website of the rancher who
      produced it and it could be fully traceable from birth
      to slaughter. For the cattle owner we could benefit
      from a cattle movement tracking system that would
      be critical in dealing with a major disease outbreak
      and it would tie in nicely with the BIXS program. We
      could be world leaders in this but no - lets try and
      hang onto the 1950s instead and support our cattle
      operations by working off farm instead of adding
      value to our produce and getting paid for that value.

      Comment


        #13
        grassfarmer----yeh the BIX program. All good in theory and that once had me even excited.

        SOLVE THE RETENTION PROBLEM and all would fall into place.

        BYE BYE RFID EARTAG. SOON SOON

        Comment


          #14
          "Alleged" retention problem experienced by some
          operators.
          The last 400 tags we have put on (all at birth) we have
          had 2 to replace. That's retaining everything to
          yearling stage, grass fats going at 18 months, bulls
          going at 2yrs, heifers going into the herd.
          Both losses we had were calves in their first summer
          where the tag split the ear, likely caught on a fence.

          Comment


            #15
            We have the tools today that would allow the
            consumer to scan a steak before purchase with their
            iPhone and pull up the website of the rancher who
            produced it and it could be fully traceable from birth
            to slaughter.

            My question to GF is when you have the tools to do all of the above why in H don't you? Trying to mandate niche marketing seems contradictory.

            Comment


              #16
              GF While the consumer is scaning this steak should we also play a little video of what a happy calfhood this steak had and the reason he or she didnt make it into the herd , also mabey a short explanation no how well it died and went to a better place.
              Give me a break I know I am a dinasour but this now generation with all the electronics and toys are a mega pain in the ass. Gust because we can dosent mean we have to.

              Comment


                #17
                I think the biggest issues with retention problem are exaggerated many times over.
                Often the problems are bigger the more opposed you are about RFID. Most problems are blamed on the tag, and not on the fences, storage and handling of the tags being used, the capabilities of the person applying the tags, or how much patience they have (or don't have). How else can you explain why some have little or no problems, while others are having problems? Cripes its just a tag, and shouldn't take a rocket scientist to put it in the ear to stay!

                Comment


                  #18
                  <a href="http://s1138.photobucket.com/albums/n523/kphaber/?action=view&current=DVDCover_zps2e500540. jpg" target="_blank"></a>

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Good post dog patch, very true.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      The percentage of people who want to watch a
                      video of the farm the calf/steak came from is
                      pretty small. Certainly not enough people to
                      warrent the expense. People want their Big Mac's
                      or Angus burgers cheap. The cheaper the better.

                      My CCIA tags go in a day or 2 before shipping so
                      only 1 percent loss possibly here. When doing a
                      hundred or so head a few do fail right away. Thats
                      been our experience anyway. Still managed to
                      get charged by NBI for tagging a few anyway.
                      Guess thats ok my second cousin is marrying one
                      of the Nilsson kids so I'll overlook it. Lol

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...