Non-GMO Corn Superior to GM Corn

[rkaiser]

Hay Jack. Whacha mean you want to take my cell phone and internet away. Sounds like the kind of censorship supported by those who witch(wink)their way to the top political positions from Monsanto and the likes... LOL

You gonna report me to yer cuzin in the FDA?

Tell you what buddy. I am too old to invite you to the parking lot since you like the drugs so much, you might look like that incredible hulk guy by now. Do you use Ralgro yerself.

But I don't mind toying with you her on Agriville.

Since you think it is senseless dribble to invite you to stand behind the counter of a store and explain to people how the drugs and GMO's will never hurt em, I challenge you to a life test. I am 52 and healthy as an ox. I say - you guarantee me that you will eat nothing but the finest GMO and pesticide sprayed fruits and veggies from Walmart and order up your beef and other protein from no where but M and M meat shop, and I will meet you in that said parking lot in 48 years...

Censor me....LMAO

[oneoff]

And you'd defend passing off a doctored soil test as a supposedly valid confirmation of food that you would have everyone believe has the nutrient value of cardboard.

What has your world come to?

[oneoff]

And just where are the rest of you "enablers".

Does it matter if lying is accepable; and "discretion" determines how similar circumstances are dealt with completely differently in areas such as municipal politics.

Bad precidences?????

[Kathy]

Randy, I just figured out who oneoff must be,
maybe Will Verboven. I posted the article and
am delighted to see the discussion. Trying to find
the source of info is time consuming, the more
working on the task the better.

Sadly, we can't go to our government for
independent testing, they just trust Monsanto's
results.

[wilagro]

Kathy: Infowars is a terrible site. The truth is NOT something found there IMHO.

Sensationalism is their forte.

[rkaiser]

Might be extreme wilagro, but worth paying attention to to learn the truth which is always in between the extremes.

[Kathy]

Infowars is definitely not for the faint of heart or
those unwilling to examine untold evidence that
never sees the light of day in mainstream telly. I
don't spend to much time there because it is
disturbing; however, they do bring to light
information that is the truth, just because we can't
handle it doesn't make it false. And yes,
sometimes the truth is horrible.

Two other suspects in the same clothing were
reported at Newtown, one was caught by police in
the woods behind the school and put in the front
seat of a police car (on news video and in front of
parents/witnesses) - who was this person, why
was he wearing exactly the same clothes as the
dead shooter in the school? Never heard about
him again, after that day!

In 1993, the NY twin towers were bombed. The
actual live bomb was provided to the FBI
informant, and allowed to be detonated - by the
FBI - six people were killed. The informant/mole
taped his conversations with his FBI handlers.

Once you spend time to investigate matters
deeper than what Llpyd Robertson and Sandy
Renaldo tell you, pandora's box is opened - you
can't shut it after that. So don't look if you don't
want to learn these horrible things. And as with
all news media ... Look at multiple sources.

False flags are more common than you would
imagine. The more people just trust the talking
heads on the evening news, the more deceit the
governments get away with. Where do you think
the billions of missing dollars have gone (eg.
Canadian DOD cannot account for something like
3 billion dollars). There are truly evil people who
will stop at nothing to get their way, because only
their way is correct (in their minds). Put these
people in positions of power (right Happytrails),
and they will destroy other people's lives for their
altruistic ideals.

[rkaiser]

My challenge Kathi is my deep belief that everything is perfect --- always.

That is why I look at both sides to form my own personal opinion --- which is all facts truly are. Some one or groups opinion.

The thing about Monsanto (One Saint) and the bamksters who run them is that they truly believe that they are helping mankind in general and collateral damage is necessary.

Sometimes our quest to offer people the choice of a healthier life with natural foods and such; has to be just that - a choice. Should we fight the other side, we in turn become judgmental like Alex Jones and the gang --- who by the way -- do offer a lot of truth.

This leads to further discussion about choice and how every human ultimately chooses their own demise. Whether it be cigarettes, refined sugar or simply choosing to eat GMO products because they are cheaper.

A lot of people get so sick of making conscious positive choices, that in a world full of negative media etc. they just give up and even want death.

Offering a choice is my personal ultimate goal and yes I come across as supporting the side of natural, GMO free, or anti multinational all of the time. My choice. But I do understand the other side and it's screwed up compassion for man kind. Even though it is all about accepting collateral damage, it is based on a weird sense of hope.

[Kathy]

I found this interview with Howard Vlieger, which
discusses the above mentioned non gm corn,
versus gm corn. There is also information which
greatly disturbs me in regards to allowable levels
of glyphosate on various crops.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9E-Xd1xW59I

According to Mr. Vlieger
Allowable EPA levels of glyphosate are:
Corn 13 ppm
Sweet corn 3.5 ppm
Corn silage 100 ppm
Soybeans 20 ppm
Roundup ready Alfalfa 400 ppm - (holy sh$$)

As of 2011, Monsanto requested and had the
levels for corn increased from 6 ppm to the
present 13 ppm.

Very interesting interview which I hope everyone
will watch.
Mr. Vlieger explains how the corn analysis was
done which is the topic of this thread, and much
more.