Okay, I'll dmit it AGAIN

[DiamondSCattleCo]

Farmers_son,

While you make some good points, especially about our two packer system, our prices are still governed _somewhat_ by supply and demand. We increase demand for our product, we will see higher prices. Of course, not as high as they should be, since the packers get to stuff most of dollars in their own pockets, but we should still get a bit.

This is where I believe BSE testing is an important component of increasing our prices. Tyson and Cargill aren't interested in shipping Canadian beef to Japan and other parts of Asia. This much they've proven. But if we can get a few smaller, independents shipping into Japan, maybe we can re-develop our market and Tyson/Cargill will finally have to ship our beef elsewhere, other than the fickle US market.

Rod

[farmers_son]

Re supply and demand. I guess that is the 64 thousand dollar question. If we had a functioning market our prices would be governed by supply and demand. I do not think we have a functioning market with only two packers acting as a monopoly. Without competition the free market system fails.

BSE shone a light on the clear disconnect between live cattle prices and wholesale beef prices. If wholesale beef prices were driving our live cattle prices (a natural result of supply and demand) the BSE crisis would only have lasted a couple of months as trade in our UTM beef resumed in August or September 2003.

It is my view, and that is all it is, that even if the border opened to our cow beef but not to live cows that the price of our live cattle would not change very much because the packers would not have any competition for the live animal. I could be wrong but that is how it looks to me.

I certainly am a supporter of independent packers in this country providing an alternative market for our live animals. I think those plants would need to be owned by producers if the producers ever hoped to share in the profits beyond the farm gate, but hey… that is just me. In the meantime the only way I see to positively inject an element of competition into the pricing our live cattle is to regain access to competing cull cow bids and reduce the restrictions on our UTM cattle entering the U.S.

Certainly the U.S. market is political, fickle too. In my view with Rule 2 published it is only a matter of months before our cows and cow beef reenter the U.S. I guess I am gambling on that somewhat. What with the U.S. dependence on our oil and the changing U.S. stance on Iraq I think the U.S will find stop finding new ways to kick Canadian butt. I hope so anyway.

[rkaiser]

You know, we can all sit back and talk about that fickle American consumer, or that elusive Japanese market, but these pirates are playing games with our Canadian wholesalers and consumers as well. Do you know why Costco has some of the best beef available in Canada these days? Or why some of our restaurants chains whine about Canadian product until they buy American beef that used to be Canadian Cattle anyway.

It's almost time folks. There will be a editorial letter coming from these fingers very soon that will (WILL) reach as many newspapers in Canada that have the guts to print it, despite what ABP/CCA continue to tell us about respecting the Canadian consumer. They need to wake up. Both of them....They need to know the story. They need to become Proud Canadians rather than lap dogs of the Mutinational American Pirates.

Stay tuned. I will run this thing by every one of you for editing and suggestions before I let it rip.