• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The real article - Who lost Lakeside - XL Foods or the CFIA?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    Best coverage of the situation to date but still a lot of unanswered questions.
    Is it possible CFIA is not allowing some workers back on the line due to lack of food safety training?
    CFIA seems to favor public crucifixion as their punishment of choice. Demonize them them and leave them hanging for the mob to ridicule.
    I've got no love for NB but this is scary. It can happen to anyone that falls under CFIA's jurisdiction.

    Comment


      #14
      Thanks again Sheri. I sent this link to our MLA and this was the reply,

      The CFIA should be under investigation and the Ministry that put them in place.

      Comment


        #15
        Have not read the article, but will after such kudu’s....just this evening with a number of people dropping in..."XL did this on purpose so as they could get another Gov handout to buy up PFRA pastures that Harper is getting rid of…."
        I mock the theory, however there is a small part of me that "wonders"...and that is the problem, we don’t know who is in bed whom, and we (I) no longer trust our governments to do what is best for us.
        Our Governments are picking winners and losers, and that part sucks!

        Comment


          #16
          The XL thing is an opportunity and not a disaster for the producers of Canada. An opportunity to finally stand up and take the responsibility that is obviously needed from pasture to plate. The reason this BS happened is because beef, like most other foods have become commodities rather than nutritional dietary supplements for people and those people and groups who think about food in a monetary way have got to be replaced by people who care about the animals, the product, and the consumer.

          If markets and supply numbers were an issue before, they are no longer. Now is the time to push the government for a loan or a loan guarantee to build a producer owned project. Beef Initiative Group Canada had the idea, we have put the plan into action.

          One thing that I will agree with everyone posting on here is that blaming is only fanning the flames. Blaming the CFIA with your article has gotten to the Wild Rose facebook page Sheri and will soon be in the major media as well. Investment in new infrastructure or even the partner that NB knows they will have to have to open their doors is fading fast as the world now sees our inspection agency as bad bad bad.

          I am not saying that you should have not written and exposed the CFIA; I am glad you did. Just letting you know that the little bit of bashing that you all feel GF and I have been doing will be overshadowed by the implications of blaming CFIA and scaring away future investment that is crucial for our industry long term.

          Comment


            #17
            But covering up problems only make them worse
            down the road.
            How can we go forward on a crumbling foundation,
            and what service do we do our industry or our
            country by advancing our personal goals in the
            short-term without fixing the issues that could
            ultimately collapse them in the long-term?

            Honesty is about being honest all the time, not just
            when it suits us.
            Industry has an opportunity here to demand a
            better agency, and the timing is ripe to make that
            happen. The cattle industry could be lead the way,
            and earn the respect of consumers in Canada and
            abroad for doing so, rather than consumer finding
            out later that we KNEW the system was broken and
            did nothing to help.

            Comment


              #18
              Randy: Maybe exposing the short comings of the CFIA will actually lead to a better inspection system? Maybe it will encourage some whistle blowers in other plants to come out of the wood work?
              While I like your idea of a producer plant I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any money from Harper or Redford...they don't work for you and me....they work for the likes of Nilssons and Cargill! Their job is to make sure there is no competition!

              Comment


                #19
                Oh and Randy? Don't look for any support from your ABP or CCA. They will be lobbying hard to never allow you to open a plant. They are corporate prostitutes......just like Redford and Harper!

                Comment


                  #20
                  If the CFIA is as damaged as some fear it is, it makes
                  no sense to build a house of cards on top of it.

                  Maybe the agency is actually completely competent
                  and there is a logical explanation coming.

                  Either way, I think we need to know.

                  Comment


                    #21
                    As I said Sheri, I am glad you wrote this and glad that this is going to be the next hot media item. Just reminding you of the implications for future investment and how NB will be all over this CFIA blame story to beg for government help --- and yes ASRG likely supported by the boys and girls at ABP/CCA.

                    Just a reminder that this is beyond a "personal" agenda Sheri. "Producer ownership" is "Producer ownership". If I am part of a new company that is owned by producers, the employee paycheck I get will never catch up to the ten years that I or many others have dedicated to an Interdependent cause like "Producer ownership".

                    Should I find an private investor for our conscious value chain project first, yes I will gain more. And don't get me wrong, I have kicked that horse into gear as well.

                    Comment


                      #22
                      I like your either way statement Sheri and feel that alternatives is what we are talking about here. You have shown the incompetency of the CFIA, kudo's as Gary said. Now let's get to work on our interview for another article talking about an alternative. I even think your old buddy Cam Ostercamp might pick up the phone and help out if we promise him that he does not have to talk to another politician in his life,,LOL

                      Comment


                        #23
                        I am new to this site. Not in the industry - just a consumer. I have read Sheri's article, outlining CFIA's incompetencies and slow-as-molasses response to the E-coli contamination. Not surprised - can anyone show me a government agency that moves at an even somewhat fast pace? I am not however so quick to agree that what has happened is due strictly to CFIA incompetencies and slow action. In the article it points out that XL notified its retailers of possible Ecoli contamination, before CFIA did! Whoopdeedoo!! Shouldn't they have done that anyway? Isn't that just smart business practice? Somehow this is supposed to show XL/Nilsson's diligence? The whole thing started IN THEIR PLANT! They "had decent protocol but didn't always follow it?" ?? WTF!!@# This is FOOD that they are sending out their doors! Food that WE consume. Food that I feed to my family. Yes, I get that you can't inspect every single piece of meat and that its a numbers game. But shouldn't XL be doing everything within their power to ensure that the odds are in their favour? That as little contaminated meat as possible goes out their doors? Instead of relying on a third party to stop them when they've "loosened the protocol" just a little too much, and by then its too late? The issue shouldn't be about the timing of the announcement of Ecoli - How about some accountability? This isn't just a case of a few people getting sick from some contaminated beef. It is yet another example of Big Business Greed and them thumbing their nose at regulatory bodies and holding their staff, suppliers and consumers hostage in order to get their way. This is no different than the oil companies and the banks paying lip service to safe practices, then creating an environment of fear when they are held accountable. This isn't just a bungle job by the Food Inspection Agency.None of this would be happening if XL Foods was run as a clean plant.But it wasn't. And they got caught. And then they blame the CFIA for not stopping them from running a dirty plant. This has turned into a political power struggle and we, the consumers, the suppliers and even the employees are the ones feeling the consequence. And the worst part is, they'll be cleared of everything, go back to running their dirty plant with ill-trained staff and incompetent inspection agents. Go back to underpaying their suppliers, overcharging their customers and praying that they don't get caught.And apparently,sadly, there is nothing we can do about it.

                        Comment


                          #24
                          This is not about choosing XL or CFIA..in my books, both are wrong. This should be about going forward with a re-opened plant as soon as possible but having the confidence that standards have been raised to those of a world class slaughter facitlity and that this fiasco will not be repeated

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...