• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calgary Herald Today

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Calgary Herald Today

    Burning questions

    (--- AND I love answering them and adding a little more....LOL)


    The E. coli outbreak has sparked renewed interest from consumers about their food, and prompted debate over who is responsible for food safety
    Gwendolyn Richards, Calgary Herald
    Published: Thursday, October 25, 2012
    That steak on your plate needs to come with a side of curiosity.
    So say those in the food industry in the wake of the E. coli outbreak.
    Chefs and butchers are calling for people to be more proactive when it comes to what's on their plate.
    On Wednesday, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency lifted its licence suspension for the XL Foods plant in Brooks, giving it the go-ahead to reopen almost a month after it was shut down as a result of E. coli contamination.
    The outbreak sickened 16 people in four provinces, and millions of kilograms of meat had to be returned to the plant from across Canada and the U.S.
    The ripple effect has been increased interest from consumers in their meat and what it went through from field to plate.
    At Second To None Meats, news of the E. coli outbreak meant more phone calls and more questions being posed across the meat counter - something production facility manager Shane Eustace has welcomed.
    "People want to know more about the process now," he said Wednesday.
    Customers are buying no more and no less beef than before, Eustace said, they're just looking to be more informed. The number of new customers has actually gone up, he said.
    A beef rancher is a partner in the store and their meat goes to a smaller slaughterhouse, which Eustace says translates to a closer eye being kept on the process.
    Unlike XL, where thousands of cows are slaughtered in a day, the abattoir used by Second To None processes only 15.
    "There is a little bit of trust that they're not being sloppy on their end."
    But Eustace suspects this renewed interest from consumers, this interest in learning where their meat comes from and how it is handled, will fade as the headlines do.
    "People are surprisingly unknowledgeable about their food. I hope this continues to get people to ask questions about their food."
    SAIT culinary instructor Michael Allemeier talked with his butchery students about the outbreak yesterday; today they will learn how to break down a cow.
    For him, the concern is the impact this will have on the beef industry - the ranchers and their families who raise the beef.
    Calling it a manufacturing issue, he said he wants to see the Canadian Food Inspection Agency or a public health body call out the processors who needlessly tenderized the steaks that sickened at least five of those 16 people.
    "You don't expect E. coli to come from a solid muscle," he said, arguing those who mechanically needled the meat were being deceptive.
    "They're profiting on people's ignorance," he said.
    Triple A or prime beef cuts don't need mechanical tenderizing, which breaks down the connective tissue in the muscle. That practice is usually reserved for second cuts, from legs and shoulders, and is used for things like cutlets and schnitzels.
    "To take a strip loin and do that is completely dirty pool," Allemeier said.
    "Getting everyone to cook things more is a Band-Aid solution," he added.
    "As a consumer and a professional, I'm annoyed by that. It sets me back as a professional. I should be able to serve prime cuts to my consumers at their desired doneness without having to worry about safety," he said.
    At the end of the day, we like to have faith in the system."
    But Andrew Stevens, corporate chef for the Vintage Group, which includes Vintage Chophouse, said faith is not enough.
    The so-called Beef Geek - who has spent the last 18 months trying to answer the question of what is the best beef? - said consumers, including himself, take for granted that food is good or safe.
    "We just assume when we go to the grocery store and you're paying a good price for prime or triple A beef that it's handled properly and it's safe and it's good quality," he said. "It's not necessarily the case."
    Just as for Second To None, customers at Vintage began asking questions about the meat at the chophouse in the wake of the outbreak.
    Stevens says diners were satisfied after they explain where the meat is sourced, how it's handled, that they don't cross-contaminate and that none of it is needled.
    In the restaurant, he's heard everything from people saying only grass-finished beef is safe to someone saying all beef in Canada is tainted.
    Neither is true, Stevens points out.
    "There's so much misinformation out there right now, that's what created the climate of people freaking out, saying the only safe beef is grass-finished and you have to go to a small (producer)," he said.
    What consumers need to do, he says, is get proactive about their food, to ask questions and find out where it comes from and how it has been handled.
    "You need to ask your butcher what's going on," he says.
    Ask if the meat has been needled, where it comes from and whether it has been cut in house.
    And it doesn't matter if you're at your specialty butcher shop, the local chain grocery store or the stall at your local farmer's market, he says.
    "We should be able to get that information."
    grichards@calgaryherald.com

    © Calgary Herald 2012

    #2
    I agree that tenderizing supposedly top grade steaks is stupid... This muscle cut contamination is scary because no one has answered "how did the muscle cuts/steaks get contaminated?"... Its highly unusual!

    As for grassfed beef vs feedlot beef, there is evidence that only those critters on a high grain ration are susceptible to the bad ecoli varieties. The high grain ration increases the animals pH and causes these nasty ecoli to florish, while the good ecoli varieties are depleted.

    One dairy farmer from the US who sells raw milk, is constantly monitored for the bad ecoli - as he is the first place they try to blame when there is an outbreak nearby. Unfortunately, for the USDA, his grass fed dairy cows (that have the milking parlour brought to them in the pasture) have never tested positive for the bad ecoli.

    If August and September are higher ecoli contamination months (as reported by ABP chair Monday eve in Pollockville) - than why not put the whole plant on a "higher" level of vigilence for those months, and slow the line down.

    I'd like to know everyone's ideas as to why Aug.and Sept. see more ecoli problems...

    I sincerely hope the JBS will run a first class operation and be a fair and faithful participant in our Alberta beef markets.

    Comment


      #3
      Here is an example of a study suggesting diet influences ecoli subtypes. Haven't read it, but the abstract might interest some.

      Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012 Aug;Epub 2012 Jun 13.

      Comparison of bacterial communities in faeces of beef cattle fed diets containing corn and wet distillers' grain with solubles.

      Durso LM, Wells JE, Harhay GP, Rice WC, Kuehn L, Bono JL, Shackelford S, Wheeler T, Smith TP.
      SourceUSDA, ARS, Agroecosystem Management Resource Unit, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA. lisa.durso@ars.usda.gov

      Abstract
      AIM: The mammalian intestinal microflora has been shown to impact host physiology. In cattle, intestinal bacteria are also associated with faecal contamination of environmental sources and human illness via foodborne pathogens. Use of wet distillers' grains with solubles (WDGS) in cattle feed creates a gastrointestinal environment where some bacterial species are enriched. Here, we examine if a diet containing 40% WDGS results in fundamentally different microbial community structures.

      METHODS AND RESULTS: The 20,002 16S r-RNA gene sequences from 20 beef cattle were analysed using Sanger sequencing methods. At the genus level, Prevotella (Gram negative) and Anaerobacter (Gram positive) were the most frequently occurring bacteria in our beef cattle faecal samples. Diet-associated differences in prevalence were noted for Prevotella but not Anaerobacter.

      CONCLUSIONS: Diet affects community structure. Faecal communities of co-housed beef cattle are not identical.

      SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: It is known that a diet of 40% corn-based WDGS increases the generic Escherichia coli in the faeces and enriches E. coli O157:H7. The results from the current study suggest that in addition to previously observed changes in E. coli, the entire bacterial community structure is different for animals fed 40% corn-based WDGS compared to a traditional corn-finishing diet.

      © 2012 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

      PMID:22583366

      Comment


        #4
        True science would be getting to the root of the problem like this study. If this study is showing results, why not try another.

        Because it might show that treating beef cattle as a commodity rather than a healthy nutritional human supplement is a bit screwy?

        I wonder what a healthy liver would do for a carcass animal? Most livers are blown in the later stages of 90% plus barley and corn rations. Would a healthy immune system -- which happens to include the liver --- be able to naturally control levels of e coli?

        It is truly amazing how perfect Mother nature is if she / he is given a chance.

        Comment


          #5
          Nice story Randy. I hope this kind of thing gets more traction out of this XL mess.

          And yes to your comments about food being commodified.

          We finish our few butcher on hard feed (straight corn with a tiny bit of hay) and the livers are almost always healthy. But they are raised in very low stress conditions.

          Comment


            #6
            yes a lot off mis information about e-coli
            not so sure about grass fed beef ??
            in this part of the country we only have 5 to 6 month of outdore grazing
            the off time cattle fed like the rest off us do .
            did try organic fed beef , not like our Alberta beef in the store .
            did look at some local abottoirs ! well better not comment on cleannes or aprons or knife change or some off those cattle coming in off grass ?
            one thing most off these carcasses are going back for own use and not for public sale !!!!!
            we all know there is e-coli all around us here but never comes to press news thank,s
            trusting same protocal and more regular inspection takes place. in those small outlets
            good news to here the plant is going soon

            Comment


              #7
              Ya get sick from bad food, ya sue the f--
              kers who sold it too ya, ifn ya live
              through the episode and are still able to
              function. THAT IS WHY XL FOODS AKA
              NILSONS is running and hiding right now
              and the Albertie Gobermont is helpin them!

              Comment


                #8
                I'm glad to see your store getting the attention it deserves Randy. I saw another abstract that stated when feedlot animals (on high grain rations) were switched to hay for 5 days prior to slaughter, their ecoli shedding dropped by quite a bit (of course I can't find it now)... Another exposed animals to more daylight (5 hours more than controls) and the pen with more light had higher levels of ecoli. The levels dropped when the artificial lighting was stopped.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...