GF - for pasture insurance moisture deficit is about it. For corn (high cost crop) you can basically only use silage moisture if you are planning to graze it. For hay, you can do moisture or yield (which in my mind is the same thing). The problem with a lot of the yield type of insurance is that it eliminates your flexibility. For example, if you know the hay is poor you still have to hay it instead of being able to graze it when you want to.
For corn, same thing, yield insurance means you are limited in how you use it and have to clear things with AFSC before you do something different. In my experience in a serious drought, the flexibility is usually worth more than the payout.
Additionally some of the options (eg: hay yield) pay out so poorly in AB you would be lucky to average out your premium over 20 years. I think the actuaries are going to get more expensive as we see more extremes and larger claim values, further exacerbating the problems.
For corn, same thing, yield insurance means you are limited in how you use it and have to clear things with AFSC before you do something different. In my experience in a serious drought, the flexibility is usually worth more than the payout.
Additionally some of the options (eg: hay yield) pay out so poorly in AB you would be lucky to average out your premium over 20 years. I think the actuaries are going to get more expensive as we see more extremes and larger claim values, further exacerbating the problems.
Comment