If there is a valid criticism of CAISP it is that we are now in 2004 and details of the program for 2003 have not yet been finalized. We were told that these safety net programs were to be bankable and as such the program should either have been finalized by mid 2003 or the existing safety net programs held in place for one more year. I can’t do my budget predictions for 2004 without knowing important details of CAISP that are simply not worked out yet. In this time of uncertainty in the beef industry, further uncertainty around CAISP is not helpful.
CAISP, FIDP and AIDA are not suited to industry crises such as BSE. Although the various industry sector participants are all affected by BSE the response they will receive from CAISP will differ. For example, a typical cow calf operator who had a terrible year in 2002 and was forced to sell his herd due to drought would have finished 2002 with no feed or grain inventory and no or reduced cow herd. This farmer would have collected FIDP or AIDA based on the 2002 disaster. Bear in mind however that the farmer may have sustained negative margin loses which the programs did not support, leaving him short of cash flow in 2003.
BSE comes along in 2003 and what happens. The farmer has had to buy cows back to avoid income tax, in many parts of Alberta feed, straw and grain inventories are up. Yes the farmer sold his calves in the fall of 2003 for more money than he expected to receive in May but the fall calf prices are still way down considering feed and interest costs and American market prices. This farmer will not collect CAISP. He is going to run out of cash in mid to late 2004.
Over ½ billion dollars went to a relatively few feedlots and the province’s two large packing plants. These same feedlots and the packer owned cattle will realize further benefits from CAISP because they crystallized their losses by selling cattle inventories in the 2003 fiscal year. The cow calf operator is in a different boat.
In effect CAISP is picking winners and losers. The feedlot and value added industry are the winners and have received much more support from government than the primary cow calf producer. The cow calf operator was not supported at 90% of the U.S. price for feeder calves like the feedlot operators were for fat calves. The government is saving billions of dollars by telling the cow calf operator he has to cash flow the BSE crises himself because his inventories of hay, straw and cattle were higher year end of 2003 than 2002. The cow calf operators are the loosers in the 2003 BSE crisis.
In addition, the payment ceilings of CAISP have been significantly raised so that scarce government support dollars are now being directed towards huge operations and packer owned cattle and away from the family farms that are needed to support rural agriculture and the rural ecomony of the prairie provinces.
CAISP, FIDP and AIDA are not suited to industry crises such as BSE. Although the various industry sector participants are all affected by BSE the response they will receive from CAISP will differ. For example, a typical cow calf operator who had a terrible year in 2002 and was forced to sell his herd due to drought would have finished 2002 with no feed or grain inventory and no or reduced cow herd. This farmer would have collected FIDP or AIDA based on the 2002 disaster. Bear in mind however that the farmer may have sustained negative margin loses which the programs did not support, leaving him short of cash flow in 2003.
BSE comes along in 2003 and what happens. The farmer has had to buy cows back to avoid income tax, in many parts of Alberta feed, straw and grain inventories are up. Yes the farmer sold his calves in the fall of 2003 for more money than he expected to receive in May but the fall calf prices are still way down considering feed and interest costs and American market prices. This farmer will not collect CAISP. He is going to run out of cash in mid to late 2004.
Over ½ billion dollars went to a relatively few feedlots and the province’s two large packing plants. These same feedlots and the packer owned cattle will realize further benefits from CAISP because they crystallized their losses by selling cattle inventories in the 2003 fiscal year. The cow calf operator is in a different boat.
In effect CAISP is picking winners and losers. The feedlot and value added industry are the winners and have received much more support from government than the primary cow calf producer. The cow calf operator was not supported at 90% of the U.S. price for feeder calves like the feedlot operators were for fat calves. The government is saving billions of dollars by telling the cow calf operator he has to cash flow the BSE crises himself because his inventories of hay, straw and cattle were higher year end of 2003 than 2002. The cow calf operators are the loosers in the 2003 BSE crisis.
In addition, the payment ceilings of CAISP have been significantly raised so that scarce government support dollars are now being directed towards huge operations and packer owned cattle and away from the family farms that are needed to support rural agriculture and the rural ecomony of the prairie provinces.
Comment