A Bit of Good News - for a change

[kato]

Canada Signs Protocol on Beef Exports to China
Source: AAFC News release
Canada has become the first country to sign a beef import protocol agreement with China, representing a major first step toward further opening China's vast food market to more Canadian agriculture exports beyond grain, Ralph Goodale, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) said today. Mr. Goodale said this protocol for beef sets, for the first time, the terms and conditions under which Canadian producers may export their beef products directly to China's retail market. A number of matters flowing from the agreement are yet to be finalized — such as the review and approval of exporting establishments by Chinese authorities. Although China has not yet concluded its criteria for exporting plants, it has indicated that it expects to do so this year. "This protocol is not only the first that China has signed with Canada on beef, it is the first that China has signed with any country and demonstrates the high esteem in which Canada's animal and food hygiene system is held there," Mr. Goodale said. "Training programs undertaken in the 1980s by AAFC under Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) programming set the stage for the agreement and are now paying off for Canada's beef exporting sector. "This agreement is a tribute to the trust and confidence which have been built between Canada and China through years of negotiations and partnerships, with our animal health and meat inspection groups deserving great credit for their long and patient work," the Minister added. Dave Andrews, President of the Canadian Cattlemen's Association, stated: "Any inroads into the vast Chinese beef market can only be good news for Canadian producers. Getting into China before our major trading partners provides a real opportunity for increased sales of Canadian beef."

[rsomer]

Yes that was a bit of good news. To be clear that announcement was made April 8, 1997.

This last March, 2004 Macau, an administrative region of the People's Republic of China located near Hong Kong, became the first jurisdiction in Asia to resume trade for all Canadian beef products.

[kato]

Rats! I just got the story off of this weeks Manitoba government weekly cattle report.

I would think they would be a little more current than that.

[rsomer]

On the topic of news, good but not as good as I hoped see:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/04-24-2004/0002158881&EDATE=

Japan and the U.S. have issued a joint press release on a timetable for resuming trade in beef with a target date of summer set. A framework has been established which includes both countries exporting their beef to the other.

[rsomer]

This from the American Meat Institute, April 22, 2004. With all the concern over R-Calf we tend to forget powerful lobby groups like the AMI are lobbying hard to have the border opened to live cattle.

http://www.hpj.com/edit1/AMIcallsforcompleterestorat.CFM
AMI calls for complete restoration of cattle, beef trade with Canada

Limiting cattle imports not based on science, institute says

The American Meat Institute (AMI) recently urged the U.S. Department of Agriculture to promulgate a rule that will fully reestablish trade for cattle, beef and beef products produced in BSE minimal risk regions like Canada--a step that is warranted under international guidelines established by the Office of International Epizootics (OIE). The Institute made its statement in comments submitted today to USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) on a proposal that would expand allowable imports from nations such as Canada to include beef from older animals, but not the animals themselves.

"The extensive array of risk mitigation measures implemented in the United States following the detection of BSE in an imported cow in Washington State dictate an expansion of the proposal," AMI Foundation President James H. Hodges said. "Limiting importation of live cattle to those animals less than 30 months of age and restricting the importation to specified beef and offal products is without a scientific foundation."

In its comments, AMI said that BSE prevention and control measures implemented since Dec. 23, 2003, when the first case of BSE within U.S. borders was announced, provide additional protection to the U.S. cattle population and greatly improve the integrity and safety of the American food supply. New risk mitigation measures implemented since that time require that all known potentially infectious tissues be removed from the food supply, prohibit higher risk non-ambulatory cattle from being slaughtered and dramatically expand the U.S. cattle testing and surveillance program.

"Prohibiting the importation of cattle that are 30 months of age and older, while at the same time permitting the importation of beef derived from the same animals, is intellectually inconsistent. It also calls into question USDA's ability to enforce its own regulations," Hodges said. "A policy prohibiting the importation of cattle 30 months and older incorrectly suggests that SRM removal can be effectively accomplished in a foreign country to render beef safe, but U.S. slaughterers may not be capable of effectively performing the same procedures."

According to AMI, U.S. beef processors have suffered substantial economic damage over the past several months and fully restoring cattle and beef trade in North America will be a critical step to preventing further equity losses in the industry, enhancing U.S. competitiveness in an increasingly global market and protecting jobs in the United States.

"Overwhelmingly, the scientific evidence demonstrates that food safety is not dependent on the age of the animal, but whether or not specified risk materials (SRMs) that may contain the infectious agent have been removed and eliminated from the human food supply," Hodges wrote. "Both the U.S. and Canadian governments now require the hygienic removal of all known potentially infectious material (SRMs) from the food supply thereby assuring the safety of the entire beef supply."

AMI also noted that the Food and Drug Administration recently announced measures to expand its feed restrictions, which strengthen the firewalls in place to prevent the possible introduction of the BSE agent into the cattle population. "The importation of cattle for slaughter that are 30 months of age and older do not, in any way, increase the likelihood of BSE occurring in U.S. cattle," Hodges said.

AMI said OIE guidelines permit cattle, beef and offal to be traded in international commerce, even from high BSE risk countries, if the exporting country implements appropriate BSE risk mitigation measures. Permitting cattle 30 months and older to be imported into the U.S. for slaughter from BSE minimal risk regions would be consistent with OIE guidelines. In addition, permitting the importation of all beef and beef products from which SRMs have been hygienically removed is consistent with OIE guidelines. Indeed, maintaining the existing limitations on importation of certain cattle and beef products would be wholly inconsistent with international standards.

According to the Institute, complete control of the cattle can be assured by requiring movement under government seal as described in the APHIS proposal. In the unlikely event an imported animal is diagnosed with BSE at a slaughter establishment, a direct link to the foreign source can be immediately established, AMI said. As an additional safeguard, USDA regulations now require that if an animal is tested at slaughter, the carcass and parts cannot be passed for human food until a negative test result is obtained.


Date: 4/22/04

[kato]

Very impressive.