• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CAIS IS USELESS!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    CAIS IS USELESS!!!

    We've been chasing them since we first applied back in November. They told us since January that money was coming (to the tune of nearly $26,000!). But it was fill this extra form, call back in 3 weeks, do this, call then, jump through this hoop, that hoop, etc.

    Finally we got to the point that we couldn't wait any longer and we told them so. Creditors were getting very tired of hearing that the money should be soon, and money for springwork was needed now not later. So they put us on "RUSH status".

    After a week and a half of several phone calls to them per day, talking to no less than ELEVEN different people who handled our file in that time, and a lot of grief we finally had an answer. Apparently, as a side note, that many people were required because each person enters a different piece of info and no one person knows anything but their small part. The calculation as to how much money you get is done by no one, but a number pops out of thin air. Also, they get to take paid vacation time any time they feel like it!!!

    And here's the answer you have all been waiting for ... how much did we get. Well that's complicated. We get $520 on our 50% interim payment, then we have to make a deposit of our own money of $330 (1/3 portion) to receive our other $520. But the final total deposit owing to our account is $996. So in the end we end up with a net CAIS payout of $44!! After all that GRIEF!! And to make matters worse, we owed AFSC $47 for life insurance on our farm loan (which they took off the interim payment). So after all that we owe them $3!!

    This is EXTREMELY frustrating because we would have made some different management decisions in the last four months had we had some clue that this would happen. Never mind the fact that our loans officer discouraged us from applying for a disaster loan several months ago because this was supposed to be so much better.

    But we aren't going to be the only ones in this situation. We were told that WHY we didn't get assistance was because we kept our calves last fall. Our inventory is too high, even though we are only up by 5 head in the total herd from 2002. It is a herd expansion they say, even though we all know why some cow/calf guys didn't sell in the fall. But our 2002 herd inventory was artificially low from a calving crisis due to the drought, and so was our feed inventory (which both count). And we were also told that had we sold at a loss, our income would have still been too high so we would still have received little assistance. And the income from cattle sales and the number of head sold are on separate pages of the supplementary forms, so those numbers don't even get cross-referenced. And additional costs associated with holding over calves (like extra interest incurred on loans not paid) don't even figure into the calculation. So there is no way to get a decent payout on this program for the current market crisis. The cow/calf guys get the shaft again!!

    Also, a word of advice to every CAIS participant out there. Double check EVERY single number on their printout and challenge everything that looks the least bit questionable. They originally told us we were eligible for $0!!! They didn't use the updated costs for bulls off their own website. They under-valued opening calf inventories by more than half for no apparent reason. And that's only the things they were willing to change. They use year-end costs to value opening cattle inventories which automatically skews the amount of equity loss due to the market crash (that's the single biggest problem we have with this). How else are we to show what we have lost? They say we see your problem with your cash position but your cattle still have value. Well then at least represent it fairly!!

    We were also told by one of the CAIS reps stories of other people with similar stories. One guy bought some cheap calves in the fall since he had extra feed and his year-end was Oct.1. Now he has too much inventory to be eligible for money, can't sell those calves now without taking a huge loss, and has no cash-flow for he and his 2 sons to do spring-work. Another lady had to sell her purebred bulls for $600 each, but since the stock wasn't sold near year-end the loss goes unnoticed by CAIS and also can't be used to devalue the rest of her stock for inventory calculations. The rep said that this program was implemented this year (ie 2003)because the drought and the crisis was supposed to be over. But instead of delaying its implementation knowing it wouldn't help, they went ahead anyway.

    I would like to know how the feed-lots managed to get money under this insane program. I don't understand what they could be doing differently with their paperwork to get around these flaws. But it's obvious that something was done differently (or considered differently) for them if tey got aid.

    I plan to try to get our story out to any government people, media, or any one else who will listen. There is a slim chance that with the federal election looming, maybe we will get at least a little airtime (and maybe something can be done to correct this). Although at this point I'm not going to hold my breath!!

    Let us know what you think, even direct if you wish:
    k-way@telusplanet.net

    My final thought is this -- I'm not a religious person, but please say a prayer for all the cattle farmers out there. If you thought they needed it before, now they need it more than ever.

    #2
    Sorry to hear this was how it turned out for you. So many people are pinning their hopes on CAIS and I suspect a lot of them are going to get the shaft. These darn government programs always sound peachy...until the check comes! I wonder how many millions are syphoned off to a bloated beuracracy?
    I also suspect I'm going to get the shaft on this scheme! It seems the more complicated these things get the more wiggle room the government has to screw you!
    If our darned government got serious about providing us with a decent business climate to operate in, instead of coming up with all these goofy programs, we would all be a lot better off?

    Comment


      #3
      Regarding feedlots....the federal government announced on May 21 that the payment cap has been raised to three million dollars and negative margins will be covered. So the feedlots should do very, very well. Meanwhile there will be all too many average producers find they have no reference margin left and do not qualify for any meaningful payout from CAIS.

      If you look at the CAIS program you see how it favours feedlots and discriminates against the average farmer/cow-calf producer. Expenses that a cow calf producer would have more of such as property taxes, machinery repairs, soil testing, machinery lease and rent, CCA (Capital Cost Allowance), contract work, fence repairs, are not eligible expenses for CAIS purposes and cash must be found to pay these bills from somewhere other than CAIS. On the other hand typical feedlot industry expenses such as custom feeding costs, vet fees, freight and trucking, prepared feeds, livestock purchases are all completely covered by CAIS. Add to that the fact that cow calf producers who raise their own feed find that increases in these non cash inventories get deducted from their Program Year Margin meaning they don’t qualify for CAIS yet have no cash to operate on.

      Farmers believe CAIS is much like the old FIDP/AIDA programs but it is very different. The old programs tended to offer an advantage to medium and smaller producers due to a modest spending cap of $100,000 per producer Since CAIS raised the cap to $3million it will spell the end of the average to below average size producer who will now not be able to compete with mega farms that can build up huge margins that are completely risk covered. That single event will have more impact on Canadian agriculture than BSE every will. The large Hutterite colonies, the 33 feedlots that control over 50% of Alberta’s feeding industry and yes even the packers who own cattle and qualify for CAIS too will now have a insurmountable competitive advantage since their risk is now fully covered by CAIS while enjoying economies of scale the average farmer cannot compete with.

      CAIS is the end of agriculture in Canada as we know it. Farming in Canada will look so different after 10 years of CAIS you will not even recognize it. The message being sent out by government through CAIS is get huge or get out. There is no place for anyone else anymore. There is simply not any way an ordinary farmer can compete for land, cattle, machinery with a mega operation that has a guaranteed $3million margin. Can’t be done.

      CAIS is worth than useless. It is dangerous to Canadian agriculture as we know it. It is dangerous to rural communities and the rural way of live. It is dangerous to the family farm and rural values.

      Comment


        #4
        rsomer - once again I take offence to you're divisionary/disparaging remarks about feedlots. The loss comparisons between the ffedlot industry individually and the loss's to the cow/calv producer are as real to each other not. At this time of our lives we need understanding and emathy not industry splitting additudes. In the last 1 3/4 years I have seen the feedlot industry go from depresion (2002) to hope to horror (5-20) to depression to hope to deprsession to anger to fear to utter despondency. (today)
        You of all people (and all cowcalf producers) need/must understand that feedlots are only margin players and have never been anything else. They don't care if they pay $75/cwt for you're calves or $125 or for that matter $140/cwt. Their commodities are adjusted accordingly. They take all of their commodities (interest, feed, and fat price) into consideration and pay for grain or calves accordingly to what they think is going to be their margin. And at that they would be happy with $25 net per animal year in year out.
        And you dam well know that the cow calf guy is the first to get a price increase if grain goes down or fats go up. Furthermore you dam well no that you wouldn't be in the cow/calf business if it were not for a feedlot industry in Alberta.

        Comment


          #5
          I have no problem with the feedlot industry. None at all. I do have a problem with 33 feedlots and 2 packing plants controlling over 50% of the Alberta feeding industry however. I have a huge concern with large Hutterite colonies taking over most of the land in this area which has resulted in schools closing and a general loss of people and infrastructure in the community.

          Rusty1, I realize you support the feedlot industry in your views. I am feeding cattle myself and I would like to feed more. I do believe a strong healthy agriculture is made up of many producers rather than a few. I think we need more average sized feedlots rather than write multi million dollar cheques to a handful of wealthy mega operators. The same for hog barns, cow calf producers, grain farms.

          It is not in the best interest of the nation to create huge mega operations. It is not good risk management. The government is picking winners and losers here. By raising the risk management cap from $100,000 to $3,000,000 they have significantly changed the competitive structure of farming in Canada.

          The CAIS program does favour the feedlot industry more than the former FIDP program. I believe that is a fact. Government has made it a mission to increase value added agriculture and this is one way they are doing it. Still, producers need to realize that is what is happening.
          I am very concerned however about raising the spending caps to $3,000,000 and the impact of that single yet very significant policy change on our industry. Previously, spending caps were an effective way of keeping big business out of primary agriculture, that is no longer. Now big business can move into primary agricultural production 100% risk managed. The average producer, be it feedlot operator or cow calf operator previously had an advantage over very large operations in that the government limited the risk protection available to huge producers. Not any more. The end result of such a change is inevitable, the average and below average sized producer, be it feedlot operator, cow calf producer, grain farmer, will not survive. Pure and simple.

          We are not talking about maintaining the status quo here, we are looking at unlimited expansion of mega operations throughout this country. Such expansion can only come at the loss of existing producers with the resulting social impacts on rural Canada. If you think that is the Canada you want then you will be happy to know that it is on its way. It is not the future I would like to see for agriculture in this country.

          Rusty1, face it....if you look at the new CAIS spending caps, unless you are one of the top 100 sized feedlots in Alberta you will be gone too. We are not talking about a natural free market competitive advantage here, we are talking about government deciding the future face of agriculture by artificially giving massive millions of dollars to prop up huge mega farms and multi-national agri-business.

          Comment


            #6
            Were getting into the blame game here big time-packers blame government-feedlots blame packers-cow/calf blame feedlots. Lets face it ladies we all need each segment of the industry to be healthy and I don't see too many tears for each other when the segment each of us happen to be in is making money. Reminds of a CBC interview with an old native about low moose populations-he said"the indians blame the loggers-the loggers blame the indians-the whitemen blame the wolves and i dunno who the wolves is blaming."
            Personally I feel the problem is in Ottawa not in the feedlots and ranches of Canada-in our operation we run yearlings-sell bred heifers-finish cattle-sell bulls -and they've all gone for crap.

            Comment


              #7
              You're defence is, in my mind anyway, very accurate rusty. In 2002 I recieved for my calves through auction, prices that I thought were downright ridiculous ( high that is). I honestly couldn't see how the feedlots were going to make anything on those calves and while I was pretty happy to go home with a sizeable cheque, I'm also too aware of what goes up must come down, and down they did a year or two later. I have had some very, very good times with cattle and prices but over the last year or two have spent most of what we had "saved for a rainy day" now I sure appreciate these CAIS comments since I have recently applied and am waiting for further "instructions" and hopefully a payment. Any information on how you guys are doing with this new program is welcomed! Thanks again! :-)

              Comment


                #8
                rusty1

                You know my husband is right (for a change). It's not us who are dividing the industry, it's the government. They do it by setting up these ridiculous programs that benefit one side and not the other -- their stupid idea of "trickle-down effect".

                I haven't received enough trickle-down to do my spring-work and I'm not the only one. I'm not greedy, I'm not asking for the $3 million the feedlots can get. I'm just asking for a fair shake. They can claim the cost of their purchased feed, but my home-produced feed is an asset (that doesn't get expensed when I feed it to my herd). Plus I have to eat most of the cost of producing it by maintaining my equipment (and even owning it).

                I agree with rsomer about the spending cap issue. That alone makes this a big player's game from now on. The small family is on the endangered species list and the government put us there.

                rusty1 I hope you enjoy the help you're going to get now at the expense of us. Just don't expect it to last because once we're gone, then you become the bottom of the food chain. You will be at the mercy of the big feedlot operators and the packers even more than now.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Go to the Cam meeting thread. Lets fight this together.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I guess I didn't make my self clear. I don't even own a 4 legged criter. I'm in the service sector for bothe the C/c producer and feedlot opperator. I was trying to make a short point with a long rant. I'm dam tired of people in the industry my customers and friends shooting from the hip at their essiential neighbours also part of their sucess chain. that tells me they don't realize it.
                    By the way my service sector business has failed (and I'm going trucking) through this (1 cow theroy driven hostage taking stupidity) But this is the first time you've heard me complain, and by the way I can't apply for any aid anywhere.
                    There is no doubt that we need to can our fed govt, our ABD cult, and the CCA.
                    NAFTA rules state clearly that we have a obsolute right to sue the USDA for our losses and our political will is gone. (probably bought out)

                    dunin

                    Comment


                      #11
                      sorry i ment ABP. I went door to door with our local MP (Conservative) and I can't believe how many people didn't know there was an election on, and how many people are un decided and how many liberals there are.
                      rsomer - I don't know anything about CISA or what ever - that's not my call to comment however I think you're really unfair at you're finger pointing when it goes to you're fellow producers who are in as desperate a circumstanse as you confess to be. The ancient point of wisdom which you remember is "When you point a fingure there is 3 pointing at YOU!

                      dunin

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I am genuinely sorry to hear of your difficulties.

                        I do not think that by pointing out the effect that CAIS is going to have on Canadian agriculture I am pointing fingers at any particular sector of our industry. If someone disagrees with my point that raising the subsidy cap to $3,000,000 is going to give the big players a huge advantage and therefore the big players will get bigger and the small players will disappear then please, I would like to hear those comments and I sincerely hope they are right.

                        Even allowing a $100 per head margin for a feedlot operation, a $500,000 subsidy cap would have been enough risk protection for a 5000 head feedlot. That would have supported the majority of agriculture. If government is going to hand out $3,000,000 subsidy cheques to mega producers how can anyone else compete with that. K-Way is expecting $44, how long can any smaller farm survive?

                        Producers need to realize the impact that government programs have on the industry. Look at how the Crow Rate shaped the face of agriculture and how agriculture changed after it was gone. Now image how increasing the subsidy cap from $100,000 to $3,000,000 will affect things and you may have some idea of my concern. I am not talking just feedlots, but all sectors and players in the industry. We cannot just presume that the average sized farm will somehow survive anymore, especially faced with the reality that government is changing the rules to give the advantage to mega farms and agri-business.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I am thoroughly convinced that Tyson and the other multi-national packer conglomerates have their sights set at total control of the beef industry the same as they now do the hog and chicken industry. We will no longer be owners- just managers for these world wide corporations that control production from conception to the plate. This will give them one more step in program.
                          And they are already so powerful that they control many nations governments- probably is no way to stop them.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Willowckeek - you're not far off. I've said before in these threads that if our 2 packers here were to expand kill capacity we would move farther into serfdom. They control a large number of the cattle on feed and that will only increase.
                            If there is a bright light - you will find in the US a movment toward smaller special interest packers on the grow. The big guns are trying to expand control. However smaller independent are being sucessfull in opperating their packing plants through vertical integration and nich marketing c/w producer ownership. With producer ownership, and iformation sharing the producer in the chain are recieving sufficient benefits to remain committed to better ways. Lets do that here.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              rsomer: You paint a fairly bleak picture but probably a fairly accurate one as well. Well CAIS is the ballgame and if a person can't play in the big leagues, then what can you do?...get out?
                              You are quite correct when you point out how killing the CROW completely changed agriculture forever in western Canada...in fact we wouldn't be in this pickle today if the CROW wasn't killed. Or at least not as bad? When they killed the CROW every man and his dog got into the cow business, thereby creating this over supply of cattle.
                              Maybe I'm too much old school but I still just hate to see good land feeding a bunch of useless horses or cattle when it could be growing a super grain or canola crop.
                              Now they claimed the CROW had to go because it violated some sort of international law, but why didn't they replace it with some actual support(ala America and Europe)that would have given us a viable grain industry? I do believe, with our climate, that grain production makes more sense than cattle...at least on the better land? Use the few cattle necessary to clean up the trash?
                              Maybe it is time for our government to start to look at getting rid of the cattle industry and start to reconsider export grain? Now maybe that isn't feasible either, as the world seems to be awash with grain? In fact it seems to me all farmers, around the world, just produce too much darned food?
                              Anyway if CAIS does the things you say it will(and I suspect you've read it pretty much right) then we are all living on borrowed time and need to start thinking about what we will do in the future? Might be time for some of you younger guys to start lining up some other skills?

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...