Numbers VS Common Sense

[The Don]

Great picture!
Thanks

[The Don]

Here is something that I was referring to.
Statscan is showing that the number of cattle producers (and cattle) in Manitoba is increasing.
When I look around in my part of the country the number of producers is down and continuing to drop. If the producer is still in the business there is a big reduction in the herd size.
How could there be an increase in the numbers as shown?

[The Don]

Now you can read it.

[Blaithin]

Vet school teaches all animals, it’s not just focused on large animal.

There is a shortage of vets for demand, because even if cow numbers are low, other animals are up. There’s a greater shortage of large animal vets because that’s a tough job.

Vets have an incredibly high level of burn out and suicide.

Absolutely we need more vets. I went from 3 easy access to 1, and not because there’s no work in the area for them. It’s not as big of a pain for the cattle as it is for the small animals. Now I’m driving an extra 30 minutes!

[The Don]

I get it. Every one in the cattle business wants / needs access to good affordable vet care.
That said how do you pay for it? 70 cent cows don't pay veterinarian bills. Even the huge dollar a pound cow won't do it. Adding expenses to the cow calf producer cannot be a part of the plan. Taking more money from the producer won't work. Nobody in the cattle business is willing to pay for the cow calf producers cost of production now.
The YouTube, Google, Winchester route has become the current standard.
Cow calf producer and cattle numbers are dropping, expenses are rising dramatically. Where would the money come from to pay these additional / replacement vets?
I don't have the answer... I just see a problem. A part of the problem is the numbers they use to guide the industry show one thing but common sense indicates something else.

[The Don]

I watched the December 8, 2022 youtube video from Manitoba Ag.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joGvSabI7Pg&t=1305s
The first presentation appears to be factual and shows the need for proper nutrition for the cattle.
The second presentation is in my opinion disinformation. I do not use corn silage on my operation. The presentation on cost of production lists corn silage as $45.00 / ton or about two cents a pound. That is about half of what it is actually worth. I thought that corn silage was based on 10 to 12 times corn price. If the price of corn is around $9.00 CDN it should make the price per ton around $90 to $108. Not $45.00!
There are so many other examples of disinformation in the presentation. I don't want to spend the time going over them all.
One of the problems I have with this is that the organization that is presenting this information is also the representative on the National Price / Sustainable Beef group. The disinformation goes right through to the top of the industry.
When will Manitoba Government and the Canadian Cattle Association start to present fact based actual data driven pricing and costs?

[15444]

I watched the December 8, 2022 youtube video from Manitoba Ag.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joGvSabI7Pg&t=1305s
The first presentation appears to be factual and shows the need for proper nutrition for the cattle.
The second presentation is in my opinion disinformation. I do not use corn silage on my operation. The presentation on cost of production lists corn silage as $45.00 / ton or about two cents a pound. That is about half of what it is actually worth. I thought that corn silage was based on 10 to 12 times corn price. If the price of corn is around $9.00 CDN it should make the price per ton around $90 to $108. Not $45.00!
There are so many other examples of disinformation in the presentation. I don't want to spend the time going over them all.
One of the problems I have with this is that the organization that is presenting this information is also the representative on the National Price / Sustainable Beef group. The disinformation goes right through to the top of the industry.
When will Manitoba Government and the Canadian Cattle Association start to present fact based actual data driven pricing and costs?

Can't sucker the next generation to sell their soul if you give them factual numbers.

Jokes on the cattle groups. Old guys are quitting/dying, young guys can't afford or don't want to be a slave, and established middle age guys like me, tell the groups that we really don't care if they ceased to exist tomorrow.

[DaneG]

$45/t may not be too far off base, seeding, fertilizers, seed, and spray could be done for $400/ac a decent yield of 15t/ac =$26/t leaving $19/t for custom harvest or $285/ac.

[The Don]

I think the $45 a ton number is low. I do not grow corn for silage or grain. The current price of fertilizer would push that number up wouldn't it?
Why would the US universities use 10 to 12 x the price of corn to get a base line number?
Also... by the time I tool up to be able to seed / harvest and feed that would add a bunch more money to the costs. The current price of cattle will not pay for any of those expenses. Turning $9 corn into $2 beef does not make you money.

[The Don]

I went outside, doing chores and thinking over what I had posted. I thought that I shouldn't dismiss what you said with out giving you the opportunity to substantiate the price you had given. Can you show me how to produce corn this year for $45 a ton? Please show all costs...
Thanks