Welcome aboard BWC. I beleive that you have made a very important point about coming together. Little more than one month has passed since BIG C came to be, and it has become very apparent that testing is a contentious issue to say the least. This week has been spent, aside from continued forums, talking with industry about the undaunted role BIG C can play in challenging the statis quo led by the harmonization tone of the USDA. Harmonization to me does not involve one player in the band having his strings taken away one by one without replacing them. Therfore a need for action. BIG C is a group dedicated to new ideas including testing, and will not be intimidated by packers who lead the USDA around by the nose.
Myself and one other founding member met with a sceintist and his staff in Edmonton discussing a tissue sampling technology which could not only simplify the testing procedure but could bring costs down to levels anyone could afford. Funny thing was, we were the first Canadian group to visit with these people, beyond a call from Peace Country tender meats. Creekstone farms from the United States has been working with them for a while now.
I beleive that BIG C has a purpose in all of this. And I beleive that purpose is to talk about this issue of testing while leadership of most other industry groups will not. We have found an overwhelming majority of membership in each group we have approached in favour of the inevitablilty of testing, and dispite the counterpunch that I expect on this thread once again from rsomer, I will not stop.
I hope like hell that these BSE positive results in the USA lead to more exports of our cattle to the USA. It is the best short term result I can see for cattlemen in Canada facing 70 cent fats, or worse, 60 cents feeders or calves. But the border opening does nothing for the longer term, only new export markets do. If those new markets require testing, then for goodness sake "LET US TEST."
Myself and one other founding member met with a sceintist and his staff in Edmonton discussing a tissue sampling technology which could not only simplify the testing procedure but could bring costs down to levels anyone could afford. Funny thing was, we were the first Canadian group to visit with these people, beyond a call from Peace Country tender meats. Creekstone farms from the United States has been working with them for a while now.
I beleive that BIG C has a purpose in all of this. And I beleive that purpose is to talk about this issue of testing while leadership of most other industry groups will not. We have found an overwhelming majority of membership in each group we have approached in favour of the inevitablilty of testing, and dispite the counterpunch that I expect on this thread once again from rsomer, I will not stop.
I hope like hell that these BSE positive results in the USA lead to more exports of our cattle to the USA. It is the best short term result I can see for cattlemen in Canada facing 70 cent fats, or worse, 60 cents feeders or calves. But the border opening does nothing for the longer term, only new export markets do. If those new markets require testing, then for goodness sake "LET US TEST."
Comment