The problem is, who would shut off what? I don't see Alberta saying no the oil revenues. Nor Quebec to hydroelectric revenues. That would leave the feds. At that level, some sort of "tied selling" commodity deal with US would evolve , and formally, not informally. That constitutes an international agreement, would not be NAFTA, and would probably replace NAFTA. And would take just as long as NAFTA did to negotiate (years). Tied selling (like the banks wanted to do with insurance) would create market distortion of unimaginable proportion. And it would not be so easy to get out of when it works against us.
US would be able to manage us more effectively as a resource colony, than they can even now. I'd call that a loss in sovereignty. That's just how I'd see it going, anyhow. With regard to Spain, I doubt they have much to lose in other trade with Ontario. I'd like to see them try that with one of their EU trading partners.
US would be able to manage us more effectively as a resource colony, than they can even now. I'd call that a loss in sovereignty. That's just how I'd see it going, anyhow. With regard to Spain, I doubt they have much to lose in other trade with Ontario. I'd like to see them try that with one of their EU trading partners.
Comment