Has anyone else been in to watch the circus this week?
I still feel I could have got something out of being a delegate, had I been a bit quieter during elections, however after sitting in on day one of resolution presentations I realise that the biggest thing I would have got was frustrated.
For those of you who made or supported resolutions that may have seen any semblance of change to ABP policy, my condolances.
Interesting how the folks that bring forward these resolutions from producers, voted on and approved at producer meetings, see fit to make fun of them and oppose them before they step away from the mike.This happened on several occasions, as did derogatory remarks from the outgoing chairman, and incoming chairman. Throw a label like socialism out in a room full of Alberta ranchers, and any words in the resolution mean nothing any more. I could not beleive the fear over wording when conceptual understanding and approval was all that was asked to bring forward more debate or conversation.
I sat through 19 resolutions and saw three pass. Those three basically meant nothing.
I did talk to a good friend, delegate, and fellow BIG C member, who by the way got the only round of applause when he talked of representing his producers.(The motion he spoke on still was defeated) Greg Bowie said that on Teusday there was a little more movement with a suggestion the Packers own 10% or less of their annual fed slaughter cattle.
One or two more positive notes, but 9 of ten technical committee resolutions were defeated as well.
Is this process a true representation of the producers of the province?
What do you think cowman, should the opposition rise up and tear this thing apart with a lawyer or two?
I still feel I could have got something out of being a delegate, had I been a bit quieter during elections, however after sitting in on day one of resolution presentations I realise that the biggest thing I would have got was frustrated.
For those of you who made or supported resolutions that may have seen any semblance of change to ABP policy, my condolances.
Interesting how the folks that bring forward these resolutions from producers, voted on and approved at producer meetings, see fit to make fun of them and oppose them before they step away from the mike.This happened on several occasions, as did derogatory remarks from the outgoing chairman, and incoming chairman. Throw a label like socialism out in a room full of Alberta ranchers, and any words in the resolution mean nothing any more. I could not beleive the fear over wording when conceptual understanding and approval was all that was asked to bring forward more debate or conversation.
I sat through 19 resolutions and saw three pass. Those three basically meant nothing.
I did talk to a good friend, delegate, and fellow BIG C member, who by the way got the only round of applause when he talked of representing his producers.(The motion he spoke on still was defeated) Greg Bowie said that on Teusday there was a little more movement with a suggestion the Packers own 10% or less of their annual fed slaughter cattle.
One or two more positive notes, but 9 of ten technical committee resolutions were defeated as well.
Is this process a true representation of the producers of the province?
What do you think cowman, should the opposition rise up and tear this thing apart with a lawyer or two?
Comment