rkaiser: Concerning a levy linking a levy generated fund to some of the Canadian Packing proposals now on the table...
There are examples within the beef industry where money, in this case a portion of safety net money, was set aside for industry development. See: http://www.albertabeef.org/CABIDF/01about.html. Your proposal is not unlike the CABIDF only with a focus on market development instead of research.
I think your proposal has merit and it might actually fly. As emrald1 has mentioned, I think the board of directors would need to be elected so the board would be accountable to the producers who would be paying the levy.
One stipulation I would like to see put on new packing plants that received funding from such a producer levy is that the funding was secured so that if the plant failed the plant remained in producers hands. I would be concerned if the plant went bankrupt that it could be sold by a receiver to Cargill or Tyson. Having the producers levy investment properly secured would prevent that. Something else to investigate is producers build the plants but lease them to groups who wished to manage them. That way if the management group went bankrupt the plant does not get sold by the receiver.
I think it would be necessary to be very careful about using debt financing in conjunction with producer levy because of the risk associated with being unable to repay the debt. Perhaps government could contribute forgivable loans to top up producer contributions but definitely be careful about debt.
Hope you have a good Christmas. Just waiting for the family to get up before the kids open the presents. The weather looks good this morning so it won’t take too long to get the animals all fed. I always thought that a nice warm day on Christmas was the best present the livestock can have so they can enjoy the day too. Have a nice day.
There are examples within the beef industry where money, in this case a portion of safety net money, was set aside for industry development. See: http://www.albertabeef.org/CABIDF/01about.html. Your proposal is not unlike the CABIDF only with a focus on market development instead of research.
I think your proposal has merit and it might actually fly. As emrald1 has mentioned, I think the board of directors would need to be elected so the board would be accountable to the producers who would be paying the levy.
One stipulation I would like to see put on new packing plants that received funding from such a producer levy is that the funding was secured so that if the plant failed the plant remained in producers hands. I would be concerned if the plant went bankrupt that it could be sold by a receiver to Cargill or Tyson. Having the producers levy investment properly secured would prevent that. Something else to investigate is producers build the plants but lease them to groups who wished to manage them. That way if the management group went bankrupt the plant does not get sold by the receiver.
I think it would be necessary to be very careful about using debt financing in conjunction with producer levy because of the risk associated with being unable to repay the debt. Perhaps government could contribute forgivable loans to top up producer contributions but definitely be careful about debt.
Hope you have a good Christmas. Just waiting for the family to get up before the kids open the presents. The weather looks good this morning so it won’t take too long to get the animals all fed. I always thought that a nice warm day on Christmas was the best present the livestock can have so they can enjoy the day too. Have a nice day.
Comment