I like the term "nanny state" I just wish it didn't describe the US also. I'm not at all surprised to find conservatives in the provinces as anyone but the most rugged individualists couldn't hang with the harsh environment in the Canadian bush.
I don't doubt Alberta is out Americaning the US, most of Asia is as well as a bunch of South America. I really am intrigued by Canadian ag innovations - like the energy free waterers up there or the Forester bale movers. Its clear plenty of guys are handy in the shop.
You're right about provincial rights - we call it states rights or federalism. Either way, the US federal government is constantly seizing more and more local power despite a constitutional limit on federal power.
In my opinion, if both sides of the border could return power to the local level, the border would be less restrictive to trade. If you really think about it, the only purpose for the 49th is to tell us which way to send our taxes. You may know, every so often California will come up with a scheme to exclude products from the other states. Ofcourse there is an interstate commerace clause in the constitution that prohibits their tricks. Eventually, NAFTA will need to be strengthened or modified so that trade is not subjected to whims of lawyers. I think a single currency would certainly enhance trade and prosperity on both sides of the border, but the US liberals are afraid of trade and Bush has been somewhat hostile towards Canada. A single currency is still a good idea.
I don't doubt Alberta is out Americaning the US, most of Asia is as well as a bunch of South America. I really am intrigued by Canadian ag innovations - like the energy free waterers up there or the Forester bale movers. Its clear plenty of guys are handy in the shop.
You're right about provincial rights - we call it states rights or federalism. Either way, the US federal government is constantly seizing more and more local power despite a constitutional limit on federal power.
In my opinion, if both sides of the border could return power to the local level, the border would be less restrictive to trade. If you really think about it, the only purpose for the 49th is to tell us which way to send our taxes. You may know, every so often California will come up with a scheme to exclude products from the other states. Ofcourse there is an interstate commerace clause in the constitution that prohibits their tricks. Eventually, NAFTA will need to be strengthened or modified so that trade is not subjected to whims of lawyers. I think a single currency would certainly enhance trade and prosperity on both sides of the border, but the US liberals are afraid of trade and Bush has been somewhat hostile towards Canada. A single currency is still a good idea.
Comment