• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BSE is depressing

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    BSE is depressing

    BSE, depression cited in case of starved cattle


    CP 2005-01-26 03:17:35



    WALKERTON -- A central Ontario farmer found guilty of animal cruelty and neglect says the mad cow crisis made him so depressed he starved his dairy cattle to death. Robert Hadwen of Mildmay suffered a nervous breakdown as a result of the stress and depression brought on by the economic losses from the BSE crisis, his lawyer told a judge during a sentencing hearing yesterday.

    Referring to a psychiatrist's report, Ted Oldfield said his client suffered a depressive episode that turned him into a minimally functioning person.

    Hadwen, 47, pleaded guilty Nov. 26 to failing to dispose of dead animals within 48 hours, failure to humanely dispose of an animal that was close to death and neglecting to provide food and water for his dairy cattle.

    He also pleaded guilty to two counts of causing unnecessary pain and suffering by starving and failing to adequately care for animals in his trust.

    It was the breakdown of a man who was an otherwise healthy individual, Oldfield said, arguing Hadwen's behaviour was the result of severe depression and not cruelty.

    Judge George Brophy heard Hadwen sold his milk quota in July 2003, two months after the discovery of a single Alberta cow with BSE closed the American border to Canadian cattle.

    Shortly after that, Hadwen fell into a deep depression and stopped feeding and watering his animals.

    The Crown called it a cruel act of animal neglect and is calling for a three-month jail sentence to be served in an institution and not in the community.

    The Ontario Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals went to Hadwen's farm on March 26, 2004, and found 15 dead cattle in a state of decomposition.

    A live cow was tethered to one that was dead.

    Four calves were found starved to death in their calf hutches.

    One cow, lying in manure up to her neck trying to reach some hay near a conveyor belt was being trampled by other cattle reaching for the same food.

    Several of the 31 animals found dead were tied in their milking stalls.

    All the 19 animals removed by veterinarians were so badly starved they couldn't be saved and had to be put down.

    Oldfield wants Brophy to suspend the passing of sentence and put Hadwen on probation or, at worst, give him a conditional sentence to be served in the community.

    #2
    I think Canadian producers have to start standing up more for themselves,like the European farmers do,the governments over there don't like to mess around with there farmers. We always seem to be concerned about what the public will think of us, all the while they enjoy cheap food at our cost.
    Tom

    Comment


      #3
      I agree that all governments are out of control. Federal, Provincial, municipal! Somehow they just don't get it? The idea should be less government...not more?
      Unfortunately, politicians have this idea that they know what is best and it is the duty of the peasants to keep them living at a level they find pleasant! The beuracracy is completely out of control and because they keep growing by leaps and bounds they figure they need to justify their existance by creating more rules and regulations...and then hire more people to enforce them! I suspect it would be better to give them all a pension and send them home?
      It always amazes me how this country ever got built without the hordes of beurocrats and politicians we have today, to regulate the peasants?
      I am also always amazed that we can afford all these rule makers/enforcers but we can't afford to pay the person being forced to comply for "the good of society"?
      Under the new "manure police" the farmer must pay to do soil samples, manure samples, keep detailed records, move his feeding sites/watering sites. Is it necessary? Perhaps. But how come he ends up paying the bill, if it is good for all society? The same thing could be said for the Endangered Species Act?
      There were probably some abuses for sure, but common sense doesn't seem to matter at all to the little Hitlers in government?

      Comment


        #4
        Manure police?? what is up with that. I think if it is soo important where and how it is all placed along with feeding sites and such that the government should deffinately be paying for this. i dont know a whole lot about the situation,if anyone has any more information about it that would be great.

        Comment


          #5
          cowman continually refers to Manure Police. After several years of consultation with the livestock industry and municipalities as well as other stakeholders the amended Agricultural Operations Practices Act ( AOPA) came into effect on January 1/02. This Act in part removed responsibility for siting confined feeding operations from municipalities and appointed the Natural Resources Conservation Board ( NRCB) as the regulatory body for all livestock operations in the Province.
          The NRCB must review all applications for new and expanding confined feeding operations and ensure that all technical requrements are met prior to approving said operations.
          The NRCB is also responsible for monitoring all existing and new confined feeding operations to ensure that they do not pose a risk to the environment and are compliant with any conditions in Municipal Development Permits or NRCB permits.
          NRCB Inspectors respond to complaints regarding any livestock operation that may be posing a risk due to manure run off etc.
          In some instances Enforcement Orders are issued, all these are posted on the NRCB website and remain there until the operator is in compliance.
          In June of 2004 the AOPA legislation was amended to allow operators to apply to have existing permit conditions amended if they no longer were applicable.

          Seasonal Feeding and Bedding Sites came under the AOPA radar on January 1, 2005. The legislation requires that feeding and bedding sites cannot be located within 30 m of a common water body unless an interceptor ( berm ) is constructed to prevent manure run off, or all manure is sc****d off the site when the ground is still frozen.
          All operations producing 500T or more of manure each year are now required to have a nutrient management plan which involves soil testing and having ample manure spreading lands so as not to overload nutrients on the land base.

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...