• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

R- calf,s at it again

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    R- calf,s at it again

    R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America


    For Immediate Release Contact: Shae Dodson, Communications Coordinator
    February 1, 2005 Phone: 406-672-8969; e-mail: sdodson@r-calfusa.com



    Motion for Preliminary Injunction
    Filed in U.S. District Court


    (Billings, Mont.) – Today, R-CALF USA filed a motion requesting a Preliminary Injunction in its lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) concerning the agency’s Final Rule to reopen the Canadian border to live cattle and additional beef products on March 7, 2005. The motion was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, located in Billings, Mont.



    “USDA’s Final Rule was issued on Dec. 29, 2004, then published in the Federal Register Jan. 4, 2005, which kicked in a 60-day congressional review period,” explained Bill Bullard, R-CALF USA CEO. “The lawsuit we filed on January 10th requested the court to overturn USDA’s Final Rule, but with March 7 rapidly approaching, it was imperative that R-CALF seek a Preliminary Injunction asking the court to block USDA from implementing the Final Rule until the facts in our lawsuit can be fully considered.



    “R-CALF’s priority is to prevent the irreparable harm the U.S. cattle industry will suffer if the border were reopened under the unacceptable conditions contained in USDA’s Final Rule,” Bullard emphasized.



    If granted, the Preliminary Injunction would temporarily stop USDA from implementing the Final Rule until after the court has fully considered the facts R-CALF USA raised in its lawsuit filed on Jan. 10, 2005.



    Last week, R-CALF USA and USDA jointly agreed to the briefing schedule that required R-CALF USA to immediately file its motion for a preliminary injunction. R-CALF USA has informed the court of numerous deficiencies contained in the Final Rule, including:



    USDA’s failure to adequately assess the impact of its actions upon human health;
    USDA’s demonstrably incorrect and unsupported assumption that the incidence of BSE in Canada is very low;
    USDA’s unjustified reliance on the Canadian feed ban;
    USDA’s arbitrary assumption that removal of Specified Risk Materials (SRMs) eliminates all risks of BSE transmission, despite scientific evidence to the contrary;
    USDA’s arbitrary and capricious decision to allow imports of beef from older Canadian cattle;
    USDA’s inconsistent actions concerning Canadian-bred heifers and fetal blood serum;
    USDA’s failure to adequately respond to comments suggesting the need for increased testing of Canadian cattle;
    USDA’s action was taken without following rulemaking procedures required by law;
    USDA failed to meet requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act;
    USDA failed to meet requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act;
    USDA’s action will result in substantial, irreversible, and irreparable harm to U.S. cattle producers.


    USDA now has three weeks to respond to R-CALF USA’s request for a Preliminary Injunction, and once that happens, R-CALF USA has five days to make a final written response to the court before the hearing, which the court has scheduled for March 2, 2005.



    “R-CALF has demonstrated substantial shortcomings in USDA’s decision to allow the importation of Canadian cattle and beef into the U.S., without regard to the economic impact on U.S. cattle producers, and without regard to the increased and un-assessed risks to human health,” Bullard said. “The serious, irreparable harm that will occur when Canadian cattle and beef products enter the U.S. and then are co-mingled with the U.S. meat supply justifies issuance of a Preliminary Injunction.”



    # # #



    NOTE: R-CALF USA’s application for the Preliminary Injunction will be posted to: www.r-calfusa.com later this afternoon. Click on “BSE-Litigation” to view.



    # # #



    R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on domestic and international trade and marketing issues. R-CALF USA, a national, non-profit organization, is dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA’s membership consists primarily of cow-calf operators, cattle backgrounders, and feedlot owners. Its members – over 12,000 strong – are located in 46 states, and the organization has over 60 local and state association affiliates, from both cattle and farm organizations. Various main street businesses are associate members of R-CALF USA. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com or, call 406-252-2516.

    #2
    Well hopefully the USDA did things right this time and the judge will get his marching orders and throw this thing in the trash can? It really is time to stop all this nonsense and get back to business.
    R-CALF makes a lot of noise but I suspect the "fix" is in this time? George W probably twisted Martins arm when he was up here and got some big concessions on the missile deal and the drugs! I suspect the defense industry and pharmaceutical industry carry a lot more weight than a few old cowboys in Montana?

    Comment


      #3
      ...I expect your right cowman... just would be nice if there was such a thing as fair trade between countries and then honour it...

      Comment


        #4
        I wouldn't write them off too quick Cowman - old Montana hick ranchers is the image but i'm told they have a lot of influential friends in powerful positions in Washington.

        Comment


          #5
          Have enjoyed this site for the past little while...very informative. Have to put my 2cents worth in. I hope the border does not open. I feel we have made it this far, lets let our own plants open, do what we have to to open new markets. We should have a competetive edge with our ID protocol to abtain some markets. Should the border open soon, some plants will not proceed, and we will be in a very vunerable position, just waiting for the next round of tariffs, closures or what have you.

          Just vision the markets, including the US, who would want our beef if we did a few simple things. Like, no implants. I have yet come across a consumer who likes the idea of using growth hormones. (For those who say beef will cost more, my feeling is there is plenty of profit in the retail price of beef, some sectors are just manipulating their share to be higher)Labelling birthdates, birth places, web links to farm pictures of birth origins (getting carried away, but lets dream) as well as test any animals destined for markets that want it. I beleive consumers through out the world would be asking for Canadian beef.

          And, if you really wanted to clinch world markets, everyone cut back their herd by half and finsh their own calves on their own farms in numbers that make cents (sense)....we would be miles ahead. I have heard from a number of people who quit eating beef when they drove through "feed lot alley"

          Anyways, back to topic...if we do not open more plants, and leave our destinies to Cargill/Tyson monopolies that can manipulate prices, even though our AB gov seems to think this is cool, and the US restrictions,we will get what we deserve. Deserve... only because we sit back and take what we are given instead of charting our own destiny.

          Comment


            #6
            Re the fix is in: While I agree the fix is indeed in, the fix might be different than we were first told. I am hearing rumours that the rule will be changed so no OTM beef enters the U.S. Only under 30 month beef and live calves.

            Cowman, I agree that missile defense and drugs are part of the deal but those last two BSE positives are not helping. What a victory for R-Calf if they can keep our cow beef out.

            Comment


              #7
              I might add part of the fix is U.S. beef trade with Japan. Progress is being made. See:

              http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20050120a2.htm

              Comment


                #8
                Perfecho: Like your attitude, even though I believe you might be looking through rose colored glasses! I actually like the idea of a re-built Canadian industry...as long as it makes sense! I do believe BIG C has the right idea...even though I have some reservations! I hope Randy doesn't give me hell though because I have come to the conclusion that sometimes you just have to get it done...period! I have not joined BIG C, because basically I am out of the beef business...but the boy sent in his money!
                Farmers son: I guess the old cow thing might be a problem, but I think it might be for the best in the long run? Hopefully we will get these cow plants up and running and hopefully we will find someone who is willing to take the meat? Hell, maybe we'll run the Aussies out of business!

                Comment


                  #9
                  I've thought from the start that the OTM beef was a red herrin, so they'd have something to throw out, but maybe not.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...