I think the reluctance of the ABP to endorse any plan put forward by BIG C or others is what is the best way to structure the financing.
It may be that the method whereby irrigation is funded in this province provides a model that works. Cost sharing by the province and participating Irrigation Districts provides a practical, established, working method of seeing expensive capital intensive, enviromentally sensitive projects move ahead.
And since these irrigation projects directly compete with existing dryland producers in Alberta and elsewhere the issue of government supporting and providing bridge financing to a producer packing plant that will compete with existing public shareholder packing plants becomes irrelevant.
Just an idea...
It may be that the method whereby irrigation is funded in this province provides a model that works. Cost sharing by the province and participating Irrigation Districts provides a practical, established, working method of seeing expensive capital intensive, enviromentally sensitive projects move ahead.
And since these irrigation projects directly compete with existing dryland producers in Alberta and elsewhere the issue of government supporting and providing bridge financing to a producer packing plant that will compete with existing public shareholder packing plants becomes irrelevant.
Just an idea...
Comment