• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Aid

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    The federal government announced a $1 billion general agriculture payment this morning. Cattle producers will be eligible to receive about $305 million of that total. It will be distributed based on the same criteria used for last year’s Transitional Industry Support Program (TISP). Producers who participated in that program will not need to reapply and will automatically receive the payment. Producers who were eligible for the TISP program but did not apply can apply this program – forms will be available shortly.



    We will send more information about the program when it is available.



    Thanks,



    Ron Glaser

    Public Affairs Manager

    Alberta Beef Producers

    #320, 6715 - 8th Street NE

    Calgary, AB T2E 7H7

    P: (403) 275-4400

    F: (403) 274-0007

    www.albertabeef.org

    rong@albertabeef.org

    Comment


      #14
      I would think that Canadian owned packing facilities would make a lot more sense than welfare checks. If the previous 400M had been directed to this we would be up and running.

      As Ted Haney also annouced this morning on CBC, it would appear that we have a good shot at re-establishing the Japanese market. The Japanese have agreed that testing of under 21 months cattle will not longer be required. Haney is optimistic that as Japan has treated our market as part of the North American market, negotiations have been ongoing with both Canada and US. He suggests this could happen within 4 months or at least by fall.

      He reiterates that with Canada's more advanced ID, traceback and recordable birth dates we may even expect resuming trade ahead of US. I think he said that we could probably supply enough beef as things stand to match our previous exports. If something happened to our box beef exports to US we would have 400M kg of beef to export to Japan, Taiwan, South Korea etc. If these markets are realistically attainable, all the more reason that we should be increasing our own packing capacity.

      As we have seen before, however, we won't bet the bank on it.

      Comment


        #15
        What a joke.... another bailout. Stan Eby and Bob Friesen welcoming it are showing their stupidity and should be fired from their posts as they obviously have no clue what is going on.
        Look at the situation - there has been very little decline in the amount of value in the beef production since BSE began. The change has all been in the distribution of the proceeds. This wealth movement from primary producers to corporate bank accounts and ongoing negative farm income scenario was predicted 5 years ago by organisations like the NFU. Ostercamp produced a document that outlined the same things yet our industry organisations and governments still can't see it or choose to ignore it.

        It gives me another question to ask of the ABP tonight - "will the ABP condemn the announcement today of a further aid package as it clearly does not target the real causes of the current farm crisis and is such is an unacceptable waste of taxpayer money. Given that it is only (partially) replacing money removed from the beef production chain unethically by the transnational corporations monopoly of the slaughter capacity of this country"

        Comment


          #16
          I would point out that until we get more packing capacity in this country there is no direct benefit to Canadian producers if trade between Canada and Japan resumes.

          However since it appears the U.S. is going to continue to block imports of live Canadian cattle until such time as the U.S. market to Japan is restored we would receive a benefit through the back door.

          Those TISP cheques are not always small. According to public documents filed in Court of Queens Bench regarding the Bonnet Farm bankruptcy, just one TISP cheque was in excess of $318,000. One of the most significant changes to Canada's ag policy in the last few years was the removal of caps on subsidies to mega farms, such as Lakeside Farms and Cargill. The bulk of the $300 million the government has announced today under the TISP program for beef producers will go to a handful of mega-farms.

          It is little wonder then that the mega farms can afford to invest $100,000 in a producer packing plant but the majority of producers cannot.

          Comment


            #17
            I got to thinking about this, packer thing. I can't help but wonder how many producers would be willing to re-direct this payment to build packing facilities?

            Unless the government would be willing to pick a winner, we would be in the same boat as previously. Which project do we want to support? Also, what happens to those investors who have picked their 'winner' and expect to see construction start soon. Would it be fair to support competition?.

            Comment


              #18
              Regarding government picking winners and is it fair to others.

              A perfect example is the Alberta government's policy towards irrigation in this province. Those few producers lucky enough to have government subsidized irrigation near their land receive the benefit at taxpayer expense. They then produce forages, grains and other produce in direct competition to dryland producers. The government justifies, and I believe rightly so, that the bang received for the buck spent justifies the program.

              Given the magnitude of producer losses due to insufficient packer capacity in this country a similar bank for the buck would be realized from policies and programs designed to speed development of producer packing plants.

              The Irrigation Districts provide a good working model on how these plants could be owned and managed by producers with government support. The model is there and it is working.

              And yes these plants would operate in competition with other plants with more traditional ownership/management but no different than scores of Irrigation Districts in this province operate in competition with dryland producers.

              To be clear, I am in no way criticizing Irrigation Districts, just pointing out what worked there could be applied to packing plants.

              Comment


                #19
                Pandiana, I certainly would not spend any aid money I receive in a packing plant UNDER THE CURRENT CONDITIONS. It is clear that the monopoly position of the big 2 will made it difficult, if not impossible for new plants to succeed. Until we tackle the monopoly we go nowhere. As farmers_son says any opening of the Japanese market to Canadian beef will not benefit Canadian producers under the current monopoly position. Reality is these transnationals have gained so much additional control over our industry since BSE that it will,in my mind, be very difficult for producers to get a fair return for their product regardless of what import bans are lifted. We need 8-10 companies competing for cattle in Western Canada to secure a future.

                Comment


                  #20
                  I am curious why you think a producer packing plant cannot succeed under the current conditions.

                  Is it because the packer monopoly are paying us too much for our live cattle. Or that there is no market for our beef, I believe there is.

                  Obviously any packer is a money making venture at the moment. I think a producer packing plant is viable even under the real challenge facing packers, what happens when the border opens to live cattle. Sure the big 2 enjoy some economy of scale but they are not passing it down to producers anyway so that does not impact the viability of a producer packing plant. A producer packing plant does not have to make as much money as Tyson and Cargill, just realize higher returns that the producer is now.

                  The concern amongst producers is that the packers will artificially inflate the price of live cattle to break the new market entrants. Gee, we bitch that the packers are not paying us enough and then we bitch that they are going to pay us too much. Producers may never intend to market all their cattle through a producer packing plant but such a plant provides an alternative. That alternative effectively provides competition. That competition is needed.

                  Producers need to look further down the road than the live cattle price. The future is in value adding and moving closer to the consumer. Time to forget the live price, it is not real, whether it is too low or too high. Either way it is a trap. The boxed beef market is much more stable, less subject to trade actions and more profitable. It is the place to be.

                  Comment


                    #21
                    Just wondering how this aid will affect market prices? Will the packers lower their prices and steal it like they have before?

                    Comment


                      #22
                      Farmers_son, I think producer owned plants can be sucessful in the long run but they have to survive the current monopoly players to get established. Look back to what they did to the feedlots "marketing initiative" plan when they started hauling cattle in from Ontario to break the feedlots attempt to raise prices. These guys have almost bottomless pockets at the moment thanks to producers and the Canadian taxpayer and would be able to take a financial loss for many months to break a new plant - that is my fear. I think government should intervene on this issue it wouldn't even cost them any money - just a little resolve.

                      I agree with your earlier comment on the mega-farms that collect the bulk of TISP payments. When CAIS was being negotiated the NFU was the only Western Canadian commodity group to raise this exact concern and lobbied for a lower the cap on payouts. You must be a socialist too farmers_son ;o)

                      Comment


                        #23
                        Grassfarmer: Now, now... no need to get nasty. LOL. I consider myself a free enterprise kind of guy, and I would very much rather get my returns from the marketplace than more government handouts. But I do realize that government plays a role in agriculture today and would play a role in producers as a group improving their lot by having an alternative to the packer monopoly. I am a supporter of the family farm, and do not see mega farms as having any place in the future. The family farm is a very solid foundation upon which to build agriculture.

                        How many feedlots are there? Really only a 100. Now how many cow calf producers are there. They number in the thousands…together a much more powerful group with a gross equity value that would dwarf Cargill and Tyson combined. The packers are business people. They have responsibilities to their shareholders. They will not throw their resources away unless they see a chink in the competitor’s armor. If you are perceived as vulnerable they will attack, otherwise you will be left alone. I agree that if the packers thought they could break a new plant within a few months they would do so.

                        But if we were to assume the producer packing plant was financed properly, with producer equity and no bank debt and that the producers were going to support their plant, their very own plant and not the monopolies plant come hell or high water, why I would say it would take a very long time to break such a plant. If you consider the cost to the packers to even try to break that plant, it would be in the billions as they would have to increase the price of every live animal bought not only in Canada but in the U.S. as American cattle would start to come North. And they would have to do this for a period of years. And the catch 22 would be that by increasing live cattle prices to break the new entrant, the Big 2 monopoly would be transferring wealth to their competitors’ shareholders.

                        A producer packing plant would be a tough egg to crack. That is what you call win-win. We win either way.

                        Comment


                          #24
                          Well this will make it hard on the oil workers and bankers and lawyers and so on how will they hide all this new money ? More tractors and trucks?
                          Odd how when you want to avoid tax $ someone just keeps pushing more your way.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...