A study put forward in Ottawa suggests there should be GST (or some other charge) be put on groceries to help fund sustainable farming in Canada - all $3.3 billion.
- Will this be considered a subsidy by the Global community to be challengeable by WTO and NAFTA?? And if so, are we just opening a can of worms similar to the BSE political football??
- If implemented, do we as farmers, lose our ability to claim back our GST expenses for our farms??? To lose this ability will be very expensive for the farming community, and of this #3.3 billion, how much will be needed as administrative expenditures for the bureauocracy to set up a paper trail for claims and disbursements to farmers?? 35-50% maybe that farmers will never see?? And who qualifies??
- What about the consumer backlash??
Are we, as farmers, going to be the targets?? We already have the bad reputation of being at the 'trough' too much at the expense of the Cdn Taxpayer. If the Government is so concerned over the state of sustainable agriculture, funding for the program(s) should be already in the system. To go after the GST is only flaunting a red flag in front of our Urban neighbours, and are we, in the end, going to be the losers??
- The Government fought having the major Canadian banks amalgamate in the 1990's, and at the same time allowed the food industry to consolidate into a single desk buying scenario - thereby taking competition out of the buying of primary food supplies from the farming community. Are we now just throwing good money after bad - meaning that if there is a new source of injection of capital into the primary industry that the 'buyers' are only going to gobble it up (as happened in the early days of BSE?)and the farmers are no better off in the end?
- What will happen when the 'needs and priorities' of the Government change and this money is funnelled off into other projects(maybe outside the ag community). This happened in the late '80's early 90's when the Government imposed a 'temporary' excise tax on fuel - which was fully refundable upon application to the farming community - to lower the Cdn debt. The refundable portion was eliminated after about 3 years, the debt is under control(we hope), and when farmers were hurting this summer because of high fuel prices, no mention was made by Goodale to eliminate that portion of the Excise Tax.
- I feel that if our Ag leaders even consider engaging in talks about this topic they had better walk very carefully (like on eggshells) because history could come back to haunt us BIG TIME !!!!! I feel the Government has the financial ability already to support Canadian Agriculture if only the 'will' is there to do so.
- Will this be considered a subsidy by the Global community to be challengeable by WTO and NAFTA?? And if so, are we just opening a can of worms similar to the BSE political football??
- If implemented, do we as farmers, lose our ability to claim back our GST expenses for our farms??? To lose this ability will be very expensive for the farming community, and of this #3.3 billion, how much will be needed as administrative expenditures for the bureauocracy to set up a paper trail for claims and disbursements to farmers?? 35-50% maybe that farmers will never see?? And who qualifies??
- What about the consumer backlash??
Are we, as farmers, going to be the targets?? We already have the bad reputation of being at the 'trough' too much at the expense of the Cdn Taxpayer. If the Government is so concerned over the state of sustainable agriculture, funding for the program(s) should be already in the system. To go after the GST is only flaunting a red flag in front of our Urban neighbours, and are we, in the end, going to be the losers??
- The Government fought having the major Canadian banks amalgamate in the 1990's, and at the same time allowed the food industry to consolidate into a single desk buying scenario - thereby taking competition out of the buying of primary food supplies from the farming community. Are we now just throwing good money after bad - meaning that if there is a new source of injection of capital into the primary industry that the 'buyers' are only going to gobble it up (as happened in the early days of BSE?)and the farmers are no better off in the end?
- What will happen when the 'needs and priorities' of the Government change and this money is funnelled off into other projects(maybe outside the ag community). This happened in the late '80's early 90's when the Government imposed a 'temporary' excise tax on fuel - which was fully refundable upon application to the farming community - to lower the Cdn debt. The refundable portion was eliminated after about 3 years, the debt is under control(we hope), and when farmers were hurting this summer because of high fuel prices, no mention was made by Goodale to eliminate that portion of the Excise Tax.
- I feel that if our Ag leaders even consider engaging in talks about this topic they had better walk very carefully (like on eggshells) because history could come back to haunt us BIG TIME !!!!! I feel the Government has the financial ability already to support Canadian Agriculture if only the 'will' is there to do so.
Comment