Just about as many "playboys" in the commercial business these days as well cowman. Corporate welfare is making it hard to stay away. Land is and mostly has been a good investment, and what better way to use it than to put some of those good old "herd inventory" cows on it.Where do you think a big bunch of those high priced purebred, and now even crossbred, bulls are destined.
Okay cowman, I'll bite yer bait on the purebred thing.
How can I say you are wrong when Soderglen, and many more, are pumping out those crossbred crossbred bulls for more money than most purebred sales. More people than you see merit in a GOOD LOOKING animal.LOL. One of the main reasons that I beleive in purebred cattle is direction. Uniformity and consistancy will be hard to acheive if the industry moves toward the unpredictable genetics of crossbred cattle. I know cowman, your calves look good, and if they aren't consistant, so what. They can be matched up in goups and sold in the market to 3 or 4 different buyers. If, however you or anyone else is looking to integrate into a market like a lot are these days, consistancy, all of a sudden, becomes an important issue. Genetic potential can only be "stamped" with purebred cattle.
I doubt if you have talked that forward thinkin son of yours into keeping too many of your homesteader bulls cowman, but if you have, power too you. I think your post, and arguement have more to do with price and costs than purebred vs. homesteader, and that part I will agree with. There are likely more good bulls sold every year for decent prices than you might imagine. And I question your gamble of keeping that one calf and making your whole scheme work financially. Somehow we end up culling quite a few of these darn purebred bulls by the time they reach sale time at two years old. One more factor you seem to have left out of your equation where we are making big money on poor buggars like you selling $2500.00 purebred bulls?
Okay cowman, I'll bite yer bait on the purebred thing.
How can I say you are wrong when Soderglen, and many more, are pumping out those crossbred crossbred bulls for more money than most purebred sales. More people than you see merit in a GOOD LOOKING animal.LOL. One of the main reasons that I beleive in purebred cattle is direction. Uniformity and consistancy will be hard to acheive if the industry moves toward the unpredictable genetics of crossbred cattle. I know cowman, your calves look good, and if they aren't consistant, so what. They can be matched up in goups and sold in the market to 3 or 4 different buyers. If, however you or anyone else is looking to integrate into a market like a lot are these days, consistancy, all of a sudden, becomes an important issue. Genetic potential can only be "stamped" with purebred cattle.
I doubt if you have talked that forward thinkin son of yours into keeping too many of your homesteader bulls cowman, but if you have, power too you. I think your post, and arguement have more to do with price and costs than purebred vs. homesteader, and that part I will agree with. There are likely more good bulls sold every year for decent prices than you might imagine. And I question your gamble of keeping that one calf and making your whole scheme work financially. Somehow we end up culling quite a few of these darn purebred bulls by the time they reach sale time at two years old. One more factor you seem to have left out of your equation where we are making big money on poor buggars like you selling $2500.00 purebred bulls?
Comment