• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

whats wrong with this picture

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    whats wrong with this picture

    Despite third case, government scaling back mad-cow testing

    Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:56 AM PST

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Despite the confirmation of a third case of mad cow disease, the government intends to scale back testing for the brain-wasting disorder blamed for the deaths of more than 150 people in Europe.

    The Agriculture Department boosted its surveillance after finding the first case of mad cow disease in the United States in 2003. About 1,000 tests are run daily, up from about 55 daily in 2003.

    The testing program detected an infected cow in Alabama last week, and further analysis confirmed Monday that the animal had mad cow disease.


    Still, a reduction in testing has been in the works for months. The department's chief veterinarian, John Clifford, mentioned it when he announced the new case of mad cow disease, and said the United States will follow international standards for testing.

    Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns pointed out testing is not a food safety measure. Rather, it's a way to find out the prevalence of the disease.

    “Keep in mind the testing was for surveillance,” Johanns told reporters Monday in Warsaw, Poland, where he was attending trade talks. “It was to get an idea of the condition of the herd.”

    Higher testing levels were intended to be temporary when they were announced two years ago.

    Yet consumer groups argue more animals should be tested, not fewer. Officials haven't finalized new levels, but the department's budget proposal calls for 40,000 tests annually, or about 110 daily.

    “This would be a tenth of a percent of all animals slaughtered,” Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union, said Tuesday. “This starts to be so small that in our opinion, it approaches a policy of don't look, don't find.”

    Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin said the confidence of American consumers and foreign customers is at risk.

    “USDA ought to continue a sound surveillance testing program to demonstrate that U.S. beef is indeed safe and that anti-BSE safeguards are, in fact, working,” said Harkin, senior Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Committee.

    Consumer groups want every animal to be tested, and that is not realistic, said Gary Weber, head of regulatory affairs for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association in Denver.

    #2
    How can Johans possibly say something like, "...this isn't a safety measure. It's to determine the prevalence of the disease in the herd."

    THERE'S a comment that'll restore consumer confidence!! Bravo!

    Comment


      #3
      Well I think that was the intention of the original testing policy? To get an idea of what was out there?
      Actually the less Johanns says, the better? I think the consumer has basically moved on and doesn't think eating a burger will just naturally kill him?
      Now if we can just get some avian flu in here the media can go nuts and ruin the poultry business instead! They trashed us...now it is on to bigger and better things!
      Maybe R-CALF can do their part and join in with their buddies over at PETA and declare if you eat chicken you will surely die?...who knows...might even sell a few more burgers!

      Comment

      • Reply to this Thread
      • Return to Topic List
      Working...