Cowman, I disagree with your take on this. No one ever tells the oil worker that he/she should have to get off of their butt and take a second job. So why does CB get away telling cattle producers they should? And if anyone’s wife is looking wistfully at the greener grass it is the oil workers wife even though there may be more money available to spend. More money does not equal more happiness. I have found the farm life has brought my wife and I closer together as we share in the day to day struggles but also share in the rewards, even simple rewards like the newborn calves and the fresh crocuses. Now we look forward to having our children work along side us on the farm and eventually having the grandchildren nearby. I believe your situation is similar.
I will not comment directly on the $4000 per month. What is spent on living is a purely personal decision that is up to the individual couple. There is a wide variation of family spending habits but whatever the living is it should be affordable or it soon gets to be a problem. And to the extent that the family living impacts the growth of the farm that should also be a joint husband wife decision. I would point out that it would be wrong to paint the wife as the one who is the spendthrift. The husband may not be in the stores but no doubt enjoys the lifestyle along with the rest of the family. And some husbands can spend quite a bit on expensive toys and leave the wife struggling to manage for basic necessities.
Can a farm support a family anymore? Obviously some farms can and some cannot but it has been that way for quite a while. There is a cost to the farm however from the time away and that has to be balanced against the off farm wage. There is also a cost to the family that is harder to measure.
CB’s comment to the effect that “if you still have a wife after trying to make it farming in this day and age” is just absolutely rude. Many wives are partners in their operation and are dedicated to the farms survival. In fact many of the farm wives whose husbands are in the oil patch have to take a larger role on the farm and are very capable. The divorces I see are those couples where the one partner was away for long periods of time, most often in the oil patch. Just does not work.
I will not comment directly on the $4000 per month. What is spent on living is a purely personal decision that is up to the individual couple. There is a wide variation of family spending habits but whatever the living is it should be affordable or it soon gets to be a problem. And to the extent that the family living impacts the growth of the farm that should also be a joint husband wife decision. I would point out that it would be wrong to paint the wife as the one who is the spendthrift. The husband may not be in the stores but no doubt enjoys the lifestyle along with the rest of the family. And some husbands can spend quite a bit on expensive toys and leave the wife struggling to manage for basic necessities.
Can a farm support a family anymore? Obviously some farms can and some cannot but it has been that way for quite a while. There is a cost to the farm however from the time away and that has to be balanced against the off farm wage. There is also a cost to the family that is harder to measure.
CB’s comment to the effect that “if you still have a wife after trying to make it farming in this day and age” is just absolutely rude. Many wives are partners in their operation and are dedicated to the farms survival. In fact many of the farm wives whose husbands are in the oil patch have to take a larger role on the farm and are very capable. The divorces I see are those couples where the one partner was away for long periods of time, most often in the oil patch. Just does not work.
Comment