The original CUSTA did include a provision to remove special interest groups playing politics with trade. When Canada signed onto NAFTA that provision disappeared.
Trade is good, I agree, but the level playing field that was supposed to exist never happened. Special interest groups in the U.S. never allowed NAFTA to work and trade irritants such as the Byrd amendment made things worse. The U.S. is not a free or fair trader.
Oil and gas are politically powerful tools in today’s energy hungry world. Canada gave up a huge advantage when they let the U.S. have free access to our energy. Now we find ourselves having to go cap in hand to negotiate a softwood lumber deal that will see managed (read restricted) access to the U.S. market and we face continued border closures to our cattle and beef. The U.S would be very much more trade friendly with Canada if we had kept sovereignty over our energy reserves. The only settlement mechanism that will work with the U.S. is called the tap.
Trade is good, I agree, but the level playing field that was supposed to exist never happened. Special interest groups in the U.S. never allowed NAFTA to work and trade irritants such as the Byrd amendment made things worse. The U.S. is not a free or fair trader.
Oil and gas are politically powerful tools in today’s energy hungry world. Canada gave up a huge advantage when they let the U.S. have free access to our energy. Now we find ourselves having to go cap in hand to negotiate a softwood lumber deal that will see managed (read restricted) access to the U.S. market and we face continued border closures to our cattle and beef. The U.S would be very much more trade friendly with Canada if we had kept sovereignty over our energy reserves. The only settlement mechanism that will work with the U.S. is called the tap.
Comment