farmers_son, I see you agree that the present system is unworkable and that
cattle producers will need to find ways to capture a fair portion of the consumers food dollar. You comment "It is just a matter of when it happens not if it happens." how will it happen though? that's the problem I have in understanding at the moment.
There are the overwhelming odds of the current processor stranglehold extending down now into the feedlots and even back to the ranches through packer "supply management" as Randy articulates very well. We have politicians who are happy to turn a blind eye (or take a bribe, whichever)we have "industry" politicians who are clearly working for the packers and not the producer. A fine example would be our illustrious CCA leader Hugh Lynch-Staunton who stated that producers have no business being involved in the processing side of beef production "if they want to benefit from further processing of beef they should own Tyson shares like I do" I believe was the quote. No doubt the fact that Ranchers Beef is struggling will be heralded as proof that the ABP/CCA were right all along and there should be no producer owned processing facilities.
I would like to change the industry for the better - see producers get a fairer return for their efforts but how do we start that change happening? It seems to me that I can either spend a lot of time and effort trying to change the system politically (difficult with the other 96% of producers either so apathetic or asleep at the wheel that they won't get involved) or I can concentrate on my own direct marketing operation. I notice that most of the really successful marketers like Salatin do not spend their time trying to change the system for the benefit of the average producer in the conventional system - they work for themselves in business terms and then try to lead others by example outside conventional agriculture.
cattle producers will need to find ways to capture a fair portion of the consumers food dollar. You comment "It is just a matter of when it happens not if it happens." how will it happen though? that's the problem I have in understanding at the moment.
There are the overwhelming odds of the current processor stranglehold extending down now into the feedlots and even back to the ranches through packer "supply management" as Randy articulates very well. We have politicians who are happy to turn a blind eye (or take a bribe, whichever)we have "industry" politicians who are clearly working for the packers and not the producer. A fine example would be our illustrious CCA leader Hugh Lynch-Staunton who stated that producers have no business being involved in the processing side of beef production "if they want to benefit from further processing of beef they should own Tyson shares like I do" I believe was the quote. No doubt the fact that Ranchers Beef is struggling will be heralded as proof that the ABP/CCA were right all along and there should be no producer owned processing facilities.
I would like to change the industry for the better - see producers get a fairer return for their efforts but how do we start that change happening? It seems to me that I can either spend a lot of time and effort trying to change the system politically (difficult with the other 96% of producers either so apathetic or asleep at the wheel that they won't get involved) or I can concentrate on my own direct marketing operation. I notice that most of the really successful marketers like Salatin do not spend their time trying to change the system for the benefit of the average producer in the conventional system - they work for themselves in business terms and then try to lead others by example outside conventional agriculture.
Comment