Just wondering how many folks on this board still support the policy of allowing Cargill, Tyson and their little whipping boy and possible partner (if you believe the rumors)Nillsen Bros, to take over the entire beef industry in this country. Our local feeder co-op went from over 300 members to a current 60. Should we assume that each of those 60 became huge players or suspect that the number of cattle contolled or owned by the packers has risen astoundingly since BSEconomics allowed them.
Should ABP finally quit worrying about finding a manager who can be led to think like the board does about supporting the so called efficiency and perfection of our industry with Cargill and Tyson at the helm, or should they allow some open thought about how we can actaully start working to save the cattle industry for our children.
Yes Cargill and Tyson will allow - (read those words carefully) WILL ALLOW a bit of profit so they don't have to own a whole bunch of cows. And those who do not agree with me will find ways within that "Allowance" to survive and maybe even make a few gains. However it is time to quit fooling ourselves about the consumer holding back the price of beef. The truth is - Cargill and Tyson use beef price to control competition. Our consumer would pay more, but that would do nothing for the idea of oligopoly.
Should ABP finally quit worrying about finding a manager who can be led to think like the board does about supporting the so called efficiency and perfection of our industry with Cargill and Tyson at the helm, or should they allow some open thought about how we can actaully start working to save the cattle industry for our children.
Yes Cargill and Tyson will allow - (read those words carefully) WILL ALLOW a bit of profit so they don't have to own a whole bunch of cows. And those who do not agree with me will find ways within that "Allowance" to survive and maybe even make a few gains. However it is time to quit fooling ourselves about the consumer holding back the price of beef. The truth is - Cargill and Tyson use beef price to control competition. Our consumer would pay more, but that would do nothing for the idea of oligopoly.
Comment