Grassfarmer, it is the nature of the beast that litigators fight 'yesterday's battles'. Ask the HepC victims. It took ten years to get them a deal in place. Compensation actually being paid took longer. It took 14 years to settle the Residential Schools litigation. Frustrating? Absolutely. Futile? I hope not. If this class action results in nothing more than a little more care and accountability going forward from the Feds towards Canadian producers, then I will have accomplished a great deal indeed.
The North African question is interesting. I do not have an answer for you, but I certainly have lots of questions. Is there any evidence the MBM was incorporated into calf starter?
As for the 'enhanced feed ban', FYI the new Canadian model is based on the September 25, 1990 UK version, not the March 1996 version that sought to eliminate all possibility of cross-contamination. You have to admit that 148 cases in 2005 is quite an improvement from the tens of thousands of cases in the UK in 1992.
The latest attack rate study published this year in the Journal of General Virology indicates that the scientists were not able to achieve an end point dilution showing no infectivity. Infectivity was demonstrated in 1 of 15 calves with a mere .001 gram of brain material from a BSE positive cow. Wow. So, it may be that BSE is like AIDS, one infectious particle, whatever it may be, in the right place at the right time in a susceptible calf is enough to do the job. It may also very well be that Mark Purdey was absolutely right and there are a number of co-factors to consider. I try to be wary of absolutes, and just keep working hard.
The North African question is interesting. I do not have an answer for you, but I certainly have lots of questions. Is there any evidence the MBM was incorporated into calf starter?
As for the 'enhanced feed ban', FYI the new Canadian model is based on the September 25, 1990 UK version, not the March 1996 version that sought to eliminate all possibility of cross-contamination. You have to admit that 148 cases in 2005 is quite an improvement from the tens of thousands of cases in the UK in 1992.
The latest attack rate study published this year in the Journal of General Virology indicates that the scientists were not able to achieve an end point dilution showing no infectivity. Infectivity was demonstrated in 1 of 15 calves with a mere .001 gram of brain material from a BSE positive cow. Wow. So, it may be that BSE is like AIDS, one infectious particle, whatever it may be, in the right place at the right time in a susceptible calf is enough to do the job. It may also very well be that Mark Purdey was absolutely right and there are a number of co-factors to consider. I try to be wary of absolutes, and just keep working hard.
Comment