Have you been listening to OT again? ;-)
What I've heard is that all the latest rulings have been put on hold, which is what normally happens in a change of administration. It's not like MCOOL has been singled out, which is what the boys at RCALF would like you to think. It's not necessarily true that it's on hold so it can be made worse for us, which is what they would also like you to think.
They're grasping at the fact that Obama signed a paper saying it needed to be more stringent, but we have to remember that he signed it in the middle of a political campaign. We all know how much weight something like that carries in the real world.
I've also read that the new administration has decided that unlike the old one, that it just might be a good idea to be nice to the neighbours. I guess we'll have to wait and see if this proposed more diplomatic approach is actually carried out. He seems to have integrity as a higher priority in his values than GW did, so who knows, maybe he'll decide his country should live up to the trade agreements it has signed? Maybe he would actually be embarrased by having his country being known as one that reneges on contracts.
It would be nice to settle this MCOOL thing once and for all, but in the long run we need a lot more to happen before we can get on with business. And before we can get the long term problems addressed we still need that market in the States, like it or not. As bad as things are, every extra bid on the cattle we do sell is a plus, no matter where that bid comes from.
Our first priority is to survive long enough to see a better structured industy develop.
What I've heard is that all the latest rulings have been put on hold, which is what normally happens in a change of administration. It's not like MCOOL has been singled out, which is what the boys at RCALF would like you to think. It's not necessarily true that it's on hold so it can be made worse for us, which is what they would also like you to think.
They're grasping at the fact that Obama signed a paper saying it needed to be more stringent, but we have to remember that he signed it in the middle of a political campaign. We all know how much weight something like that carries in the real world.
I've also read that the new administration has decided that unlike the old one, that it just might be a good idea to be nice to the neighbours. I guess we'll have to wait and see if this proposed more diplomatic approach is actually carried out. He seems to have integrity as a higher priority in his values than GW did, so who knows, maybe he'll decide his country should live up to the trade agreements it has signed? Maybe he would actually be embarrased by having his country being known as one that reneges on contracts.
It would be nice to settle this MCOOL thing once and for all, but in the long run we need a lot more to happen before we can get on with business. And before we can get the long term problems addressed we still need that market in the States, like it or not. As bad as things are, every extra bid on the cattle we do sell is a plus, no matter where that bid comes from.
Our first priority is to survive long enough to see a better structured industy develop.
Comment