This isn't about consumers/producers otherwise the EU "government" and the cdn government would be out of the picture. Thus bad politics has a potential as both governments are involved.
This isn't about consumers/producers otherwise organic producers who have a guaranteed protocol (accepted by the EU) would not have to suffer one second because their protocol keeps the GM out of their products.
It's about one government setting its own rules (fine by me as we do it with our supply management sector so Canada is two faced if it were to complain). It's about one government finding a contravention of its rule, not providing evidence to verify its concern, using that concern to broadbrush all similar products including those with supposed tighter protocols. It's about a government that has decided to close a border rather than send one shipment home on a contravention basis and requiring any future shipments to be tested. This would have been a pragmatic, "safe" response that would not stink of a trade barrier.
This isn't about consumers/producers otherwise organic producers who have a guaranteed protocol (accepted by the EU) would not have to suffer one second because their protocol keeps the GM out of their products.
It's about one government setting its own rules (fine by me as we do it with our supply management sector so Canada is two faced if it were to complain). It's about one government finding a contravention of its rule, not providing evidence to verify its concern, using that concern to broadbrush all similar products including those with supposed tighter protocols. It's about a government that has decided to close a border rather than send one shipment home on a contravention basis and requiring any future shipments to be tested. This would have been a pragmatic, "safe" response that would not stink of a trade barrier.
Comment