Okay, if that is true, then there would be an incentive to segregate for a specific market, and perform their required tests on that specific amount.
It's just that I've never knowingly pocketed a European food flax premium with the price discovery mechanisms provided by our exporting agents.
Is a Canadian farmer to believe that there is a health danger to a European toddler that happens to lick the linoleum flooring made from a trace amount of triffid flax? Or should the parent have a greater concern for the layer above it?
This smacks of the same logic that all water must be treated through drinking standards facilities when industrial users only require that the water be wet.
We are all forced to pay to protect the sap that can't understand that this water compartment or tap, or flax cargo is not to be drawn from and used for human consumption (even though another continent may not have those concerns.)
It's just that I've never knowingly pocketed a European food flax premium with the price discovery mechanisms provided by our exporting agents.
Is a Canadian farmer to believe that there is a health danger to a European toddler that happens to lick the linoleum flooring made from a trace amount of triffid flax? Or should the parent have a greater concern for the layer above it?
This smacks of the same logic that all water must be treated through drinking standards facilities when industrial users only require that the water be wet.
We are all forced to pay to protect the sap that can't understand that this water compartment or tap, or flax cargo is not to be drawn from and used for human consumption (even though another continent may not have those concerns.)
Comment