In a copy of the decision forwarded from Ritz's office, Russell on Friday found the group's allegation, that Ritz's order was meant "to disenfranchise a certain group of eligible voters," did not correspond with a reading of Ritz's order "as a whole."
Furthermore, Russell wrote, "such a view of (Ritz's order) disregards the fact that it had no effect on the rights of any potential voter to vote."
Furthermore, Russell wrote, "such a view of (Ritz's order) disregards the fact that it had no effect on the rights of any potential voter to vote."
Comment