Real CWB lovers dont hold grain over

[gregpet]

I don't recall too many people coming to your defence agstar, is that even an arguement or is that one of those comments that serve no purpose and do not add anything to the discussion as mentioned earlier by you?

[silverback]

Is it a human right to not be offended?

[Jagfarms]

How could you even use nabours voting if thier Jewish neighbours would get a train ride!! As a reference comparing it to anything?
No matter how bad you think the CWB it does compare to the reference you used.
There were no Jewish people who willingly opted on to the train ride.

[AG_guy]

Good thing seeding is comming shortly.

We don't need a mel gibson farmer.

[Fransisco]

Soooo...voting your neighbor onto a train, bad.

But voting away your neighbors grain, good.

Explain?

Personally, I don't think anybody gets a vote on any of this and find the whole concept offensive.

Why do you get offended at the one, but not the other?

[wilagro]

cropduster is way out of line on that comment about Jews and train rides no matter what you other anti-CWBers say.

The inference to tactics of the Nazis is quite apparent.

As far as the current topic goes...Real CWB lovers may hold over what ever they like. What has this to do with loyalty or belief in pooling. You guys are making a mountain out of a grain of sand.

[Fransisco]

As I said before without property rights no other rights are possible. You seem to think otherwise. Again, please explain.

[Fransisco]

Or perhaps is it that you believe that the difference between right and wrong is only a difference of degree. That it's okay to steal as long as it's not too much.

[wilagro]

Fransisco...many moons ago the farmers of western Canada petitioned their respective provincial governments to intervene on their behalf to have the federal government to take over marketing of some of their grain through the CWB. In doing so they had to give up their so-called property rights on those designated grains in order for the system to work.

If you want to change that NOW, then reverse the procedure and if the farmers want to abandon the CWB, then it will happen. Let ALL of the producers in the designated area vote whether they currently produce the designated grains or not. Don't cook the voters lists and flood the west with propaganda...I'm sure that I would agree with and abide with the decision. I think that the vote would need a 70% approval rate to be considered fair.

[Fransisco]

Sorry willy, but your grandpa didn't vote away my rights. They are inalienable.

[Fransisco]

Make the thing voluntary and let farmers vote with their trucks. That's the only vote that matters.

[Fransisco]

When you say "so-called" property rights does that mean you don't believe in property rights? If so, why not?