For years, the WBGA was the last bastion of the marketing choice principle where farmers weren't begging for cash from corps or govt's to run their organization.
It wasn't a glitzy organization, but that is EXACTLY what lent them credibility, and why what they said meant something.
Unfortunately the WBGA's established free-market 'voice' paid a mingling fee, and latched onto a government partner.
Did you notice, this past year, as the WBGA veered from their marketing choice priority, into a 'close
working partnership' in order to entice cash out of the CWB for a WBGA partnership project?
"Caved"
The CWB licked their lips all the way to a very finely set Board table. Only somebody elected would get to serve that last supper, right?
Hard to bite the hand that feeds you, isn't it. Pars
It wasn't a glitzy organization, but that is EXACTLY what lent them credibility, and why what they said meant something.
Unfortunately the WBGA's established free-market 'voice' paid a mingling fee, and latched onto a government partner.
Did you notice, this past year, as the WBGA veered from their marketing choice priority, into a 'close
working partnership' in order to entice cash out of the CWB for a WBGA partnership project?
"Caved"
The CWB licked their lips all the way to a very finely set Board table. Only somebody elected would get to serve that last supper, right?
Hard to bite the hand that feeds you, isn't it. Pars
Comment