• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Barley Top Up Payment

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    Since you asked, Charlie.....

    Since inception of the Contingency Fund (CF):

    From PPOs ............ -48.4 million
    From pool accts ...... 28.2 million
    From cash trading .... 22.2 million
    Interest earned ...... 2.7 million

    Of the 28.2 million from pool accounts, 21.0 was from feed barley pools (75%).

    Of the 50.4 million from pool accounts and cash trading combined, 43.2 million (86%) was from feed barley.

    Interesting fact - all the money the CWB has taken from the feed barley pools and feed barley cash trading isn't enough to cover all the losses in PPO trading since inception.

    When the PPOs and the CF were created, they were supposed to be self-sustaining. The only reason interest revenue from the barley pools was dumped into the CF was because in 01-02 the CWB had to remove interest revenue from the pool account or else have an embarrassingly large payment on an embarrassingly small pool.

    How much of this latest fiasco will end up in the CF?

    CF also stands for Cluster F___

    Comment


      #14
      I'll try to end this - well on my end anyway
      I don't think at the start of the export biz that anyone ever mentioned there MIGHT be a top up by the CWB. I never heard that.
      I believe since there is a big price spread from what the farmer wanted on his GPO and got booked at, by the line companies (BTW which was better than prior domestic levels) compared to export sales price the CWB proposing to give some back to the farmer.
      How CWB dispurses money & thier adm cost etc I won't get into that - too much debate how it'll be determined.

      As for local domestic feed price well lots of factors are keeping the feed lot alley price from appreciating as quickly as the export.

      Lots of other options for feeders to use - feed durum was a big a month ago, cheap corn DDG's offered weekly, cheap by-products (ie: mill run & malt sprout pellets), pasture's and hay in good shape. One of the biggest reasons cattle numbers are down in feed lot alley at this time, so demand is not there.
      With late crops these feeders are not covered and they know higher prices likely are around the corner but they are hanging onto the thought of JACK FROST comming to town - which if a big feed wheat crop across the prairies does materialize what will the local domestic feed grain prices be now. Feeders won't give a crap about export barley price as they'll feed wheat and other choices.

      The local cash market always takes time to catch up if export pricing sky rockets.

      As for is he happy - probably not - but is he happy when he sells canola and the next day it jumps $.50/bu.

      My point is: If you sign a contract/GPO and get the price you asked for you should be happy as it was your choice to put that price out there.(unless forced sell by the banker)

      By the amount of tonnes reportedly sold alot of growers like the prices at that time.

      Hopefully growers only sold 25% of production and have more to offer with a triger price of $4/bu and the export marketplace will continue to buy it.
      Over & out

      Comment


        #15
        At this point it is the overall lateness of the crop and the lack of combining by this date which keeps feedlots on the sidelines, not just the prospect of frost. Farmers should be motivated to keep harvesting and to minimize down time. Therefore if barley is harvested at a higher moisture and you can find an end user to take it the farmer will most likely do that as long as the price is not too bad....say 3.20 del lethbridge for 16 to 17 percent barley. Of course if the farmer has an unlimited access to aeration or grain bags this will not happen. Chances are that no tough barley will hit the export market.

        Comment


          #16
          Charlie,

          It should be perfectly clear now... who the CWB monopoly works for. LIVESTOCK consumers, Millers, Malties, and the Eastern Establishment.

          We must pool. Cash prices are evil.

          Comment


            #17
            Off the wall questions.

            Can Guraranteed Delivery Contracts work without some type of price
            signal involved (even if a muted and suspect one)?

            Would the feed barley model (GDC and price via grain companies) work
            for winter, prairie spring, soft white and extra strong wheats? Is this
            the way the CWB will be going with changes in the future highlighting
            that GDC will be the only way to contract/deliver some of these wheats?

            Comment


              #18
              Got an email from someone who asked why there aren't more questions on this issue.

              From a newsletter I get.

              Japan bought 2 large parcels from Canada on tenders past month for Sept/Oct last trading around USD $255-260 FOB. MY COMMENTS - WORKS BACK TO $4.50/BU ALBERTA.

              CWB will continue to pursue export interests as long as they can source from domestic market. They have a built-in margin by keeping the lid on domestic market levels. MY COMMENTS - LESS LIKELY TO MAKE THEIR MALT BARLEY PRO/CASHPLUS LOOK BAD OR HAVE FARMERS WALK ON CONTRACTS.

              Comment


                #19
                More numbers.

                Grain companies apparently did the business at about Cdn $210 to $215/tonne Instore west coast (likely Prince Rupert). Full cost rail, elevation etc back to Alberta elevator - $50 to $55 ish (full cost recovery/no risk). A further $15 at port for fobbing (handling/loading ship). Sale price loaded vessel $255 to $260 (not sure in previous quote whether Cdn or USD $). That leaves $25 to $30/tonne CWB margin to 1) cover bad says over the year, 2) paid back to producers who participated in the program, 3) paid into the pooling accounts as an administration fee or 4) transferred to the contingency fund.

                Comment


                  #20
                  Mistake alert

                  That leaves $25 to $30/tonne CWB margin to 1) cover bad SALES over the year,

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...