• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Food Quality

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Food Quality

    "Pfizer rejects infant formula aluminium fears
    By Rory Harrington, 06-Sep-2010

    Related topics: Quality & Safety

    Pfizer Nutrition has declared all its infant formula products meet strict international rules on aluminium levels after a UK study raised concerns over the amount of the metal present in a number of leading baby milk brands – including ones made by the company.

    The multi-national food and pharmaceutical firm was responding to research from Keele University that concluded many major infant formula brands tested were “significantly contaminated” with aluminium. Concentrations of the metal detected were up to 40 times higher than are present in breast milk and several times higher than are allowed in drinking water, said lead researcher Dr Chris Exley.

    Pfizer is the parent company of SMA Nutrition – whose products were included in the survey of 15 infant formulas as part of the study. Cow & Gate, HIPP Organic and Aptamil were the other brands. Pfizer said that no aluminium was added to its products as part of the manufacturing process and that the metal was present naturally in many foodstuffs, cooking utensils and packaging.

    Study findings

    The research found that concentrations of the metal ranged from ca 176 to 700 µg/L in ready-made milks – with the highest concentration found in a product for pre-term babies. Consumption of these milk formulas would result in the ingestion of up to 600 µg of aluminium a day, said the team. Aluminium levels in SMA's First Infant Milk and Follow-on Milk were among the lowest of those tested.

    The team also discovered that powders used to make milk contained aluminium levels from around 2.4 to 4.3 µg/g. The lower level of 2.4 µg/g was the reading for SMA First Infant Milk, while the latter reading was for SMA Wysoy Soya Infant Formula - equating to a ready-to-drink concentration of 333 and 629 µg/L respectively, said the study.

    Number one priority

    Responding to the study, which Pfizer described as “small”, the company stressed that safety was its number one concern and that it rigorously scrutinised levels of aluminium in its infant formulas to ensure they adhered to all international standards.

    “It is important for consumers to know that Pfizer Nutrition does not add aluminium to its products,” a company spokeswoman told

    FoodProductionDaily.com. “Aluminium is naturally-occurring in the environment and is present in many fruits, vegetables, packaged foods, beverages and water, as well as in cooking pans and foils.”

    She added: “The safety of our products is our number one priority. We follow stringent international guidelines regarding the production of our formula. We monitor aluminium regularly as part of a rigorous surveillance program to safeguard our products. We also adhere to regulatory limits established in the countries in which we operate.”

    Pfizer said it would carefully review the authors’ methodology, results and conclusions to determine how it fits into the existing body of literature on this topic.

    The British Specialist Nutrition Association (BSNA) – a trade association body of which Pfizer Nutrition and Danone are the only two members – said monitoring by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) had shown their members' products to be safe and within Tolerable Weekly Intake levels established in 2008. The TWI is a conservative safety level that applies to all ages, it added.

    “In the light of this new data our members will continue to analyse and monitor their products and work with the authorities to ensure that their formulas continue to be within the safety limit,” said the body. “Parents can be reassured that their advice and the advice of the FSA is that there is no need to change their baby’s feed.”

    Pars

    #2
    That was the long version. For the following posts, I'll merely copy edited blips from the last few days of alerts I get by email. LAST FEW DAYS.

    Could we reasonably say there is something systemically amiss with our food when constant recall and problems are publicly divulged in neverending streams?

    "News in brief

    Largest salmonella outbreak in years linked to duck eggs

    The largest outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium DT8 in recent years in Ireland has been found to be linked to duck eggs, according to an ongoing investigation..."

    Comment


      #3
      "Significant rise in undeclared EU food ingredient allergen warnings

      2009 saw a significant rise in EU allergen warnings relating to undeclared milk ingredients and sulphites, according to the annual report of union food safety reporting body the RASFF..."

      Comment


        #4
        "Government scientists claim food industry interests block safety measures

        A new survey of government scientists and inspectors has suggested that parts of the food industry influence and withhold food safety data to protect their business interests... "

        Comment


          #5
          "EFSA calls for more data before decision on flavourings safety

          The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has advised that safe usage levels of seven flavouring substances commonly used in or on food in member states should be reassessed, due to reservations about industry data submitted... "

          Comment


            #6
            "Call for industry to check sourcing to prevent 'honey laundering'

            A coalition of honey producers and importers has called on industry to question its sourcing of honey in light of the recent crackdown on honey smuggled from China... "

            Comment


              #7
              "USDA sued over GM sugar

              A coalition of environmental and farming groups has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) accusing it of sidestepping a ban on the planting of genetically modified (GM) sugar beets..."

              Comment


                #8
                These are just from the last few days.

                My point is this:

                If we as producers grow healthy food, and we do our share but the processors/chain who buy our raw grains do not, will eaters end up preferring to buy from alternate countries that they trust?

                Western farmers sell grain to China but I do not want to eat what they manufacture. Nor do I trust their products. Am I the only one? Pars

                Comment


                  #9
                  Pars, talk to your self much???? lol - just pokin yah.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Umh! Pokin ya?....... you guys want a room? lol!!!!

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...