Reading your obervations... yes, well.
It's rather like the 34 year old man from rural China who worked on our farm, and pointed to my electric stove and said, "What is this box, it it very unusual?" and I thought, "Where does one begin?"
To make any kind of meaningful change acceptable requires solid reasoning based upon a sound principle.
The basic principle that growing numbers of farmers believe in, that makes them want to change the CWB, is that ZERO farmers should be jailed for trying to sell what they grow.
Not just dairy monopoly, or fish monopoly, or wheat monopoly, but ANY single desk cannot be legitamized morally, by jailing ANY of the wealth-producers.
Those who try to sell economics as the basic principle for pushing change, (which is merely to capture a few more bucks), will entice few enthusiastic followers.
Is Farmer OneEye quite prepared to let the single desk concept chug along, as long as he gets a little more money, or some additional concession. He is for sale?
"If I am the only guy in town with an autographed Wayne Gretzkey Rookie Card It should be worth more when I go to sell it than if there were 100 guys trying to sell the same thing."
...I started to respond, but concluded the statement had not earned a reply.
The CWB elections are attracting asbout as much farmer excitement as a conference on Mens' PMS would muster:
Some the CWB directors advocate supply management, with them being one of the elite suppliers, and they will throw your mother and your father and your sister and your brother in jail for that opportunity. Nice partners, huh?
Some of the CWB directors "look the other way" as long as they get their per diems. Nice warbles, huh?
"Some of the Director farmers will concede to "tweaking" the CWB, bragging about a tiny concession to shutup the likes of bucket or fransisco, who know what the real issue is..... Marketing freedom. You'll send those directors re-election money, mbratrud?
A few of the new boys running for office are the slime who do not have the kahoonas to state what their principles are. They pretend they are choice marketers, but they don't want to say so, because they are willing to DECIEVE to win. They are not who they seem. Which means, they wouldn't know a bloody principle if they fell on it in broad daylight.
Re-read and re-read and re-read your comments for a few weeks, mbratrud, and with a little luck, you'll revise your view. Pars
It's rather like the 34 year old man from rural China who worked on our farm, and pointed to my electric stove and said, "What is this box, it it very unusual?" and I thought, "Where does one begin?"
To make any kind of meaningful change acceptable requires solid reasoning based upon a sound principle.
The basic principle that growing numbers of farmers believe in, that makes them want to change the CWB, is that ZERO farmers should be jailed for trying to sell what they grow.
Not just dairy monopoly, or fish monopoly, or wheat monopoly, but ANY single desk cannot be legitamized morally, by jailing ANY of the wealth-producers.
Those who try to sell economics as the basic principle for pushing change, (which is merely to capture a few more bucks), will entice few enthusiastic followers.
Is Farmer OneEye quite prepared to let the single desk concept chug along, as long as he gets a little more money, or some additional concession. He is for sale?
"If I am the only guy in town with an autographed Wayne Gretzkey Rookie Card It should be worth more when I go to sell it than if there were 100 guys trying to sell the same thing."
...I started to respond, but concluded the statement had not earned a reply.
The CWB elections are attracting asbout as much farmer excitement as a conference on Mens' PMS would muster:
Some the CWB directors advocate supply management, with them being one of the elite suppliers, and they will throw your mother and your father and your sister and your brother in jail for that opportunity. Nice partners, huh?
Some of the CWB directors "look the other way" as long as they get their per diems. Nice warbles, huh?
"Some of the Director farmers will concede to "tweaking" the CWB, bragging about a tiny concession to shutup the likes of bucket or fransisco, who know what the real issue is..... Marketing freedom. You'll send those directors re-election money, mbratrud?
A few of the new boys running for office are the slime who do not have the kahoonas to state what their principles are. They pretend they are choice marketers, but they don't want to say so, because they are willing to DECIEVE to win. They are not who they seem. Which means, they wouldn't know a bloody principle if they fell on it in broad daylight.
Re-read and re-read and re-read your comments for a few weeks, mbratrud, and with a little luck, you'll revise your view. Pars
Comment