• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A solution yes or no? If not then why?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    It's timeconsuming to have to deal with a frustrated liberano fling themselves upon a virtual floor, and then whine and screech with their keyboard, but it also obligates a reply.

    You say:
    "The rest of the world is retained for the CWB and you play by their rules. But the CWB will be completely farmer directed there will be no federal appointees. It will become more a producer body."

    I would never agree to this scheme.

    And this is why:

    The CWB Act is a federal act.

    Many provincial supply management fanatics would like to change the CWB act so that only x number of farmers would be able to grow grain.

    Supply plus Managememt.

    It's presently impossible because the federal CWB act supercedes any provincial marketing act as the Feds requested and received provincial enabling legislation when the act was written in 1947.

    The present CWB Act obligates the CWB to buy grain from ANY and ALL DA farmers offering grain to the CWB.

    If the CWB Act was revoked, it would probably be replaced by a new supply management act for grain growing in the DA.

    As is in effect for milk and turkeys.

    And speaking of turkeys, many of the gullible will not anticipate sly planners planning a plan to shoot much of the present production into non-existence.

    So until there is recorded legal evidence that a new supplanting act will unequivocably state that supply management is not and will not be part of wheat and barley marketing, I say NO to each and every belly button gazing scheme.

    Pars

    Comment


      #26
      You are an idiot psb.

      Anyone who would say that those that are advocating for freedom of choice are "stomping all over everyone else" is living in some parallel universe.

      We want freedom of choice for us, for our kids, for you, and for your kids.

      HOW in the hell can that be a bad thing?

      Unreal!

      Comment


        #27
        PSB,
        Good thing, myself being dull-witted, that I married a cleverist,(a willing choice, he was, but I bewitched him, lol,) and produced an aerospace scientist(no credit to me!).

        Imagine if you and I had been matched by central-planners!(Not your choice nor mine! But then, wouldn't we be the default dullard-match leftovers?) I-yi-yi!

        The world could then legitimately claim, "so much for survival of the smartest" LOL

        I rest my case for choice. LOLOLOL Pars

        Comment


          #28
          Trust me psb,there are very few new things under the
          sun.

          A thousand generations of thinkers that where as
          smart as all of us have been working on this shit for a
          very long time.

          "two types of people in this world,those who want to
          be left alone and those who wont leave them alone"-
          cant remember the author

          Comment


            #29
            Jesus im tempted to pull out my word gun and just kill
            IT.

            Comment


              #30
              Restraint?

              Why cotton, you are showing signs of aging. LOL Pars

              Comment


                #31
                If I seem to take part in politics, it is only because politics encircles us today like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. I wish therefore to wrestle with the snake.
                -Mahatma Gandhi

                As long as the CWB snake continues to encircle western Canadian farmers you will find farmers who want to wrestle with the snake.

                Comment


                  #32
                  Wrestle all you want, there are quicker ways to kill things than that.

                  Shoot it, poison it, just kill it.

                  Ritz/the conservatives don't have the balls to kill it. If they put it up right now, even goodale wouldn't fight an election over it.

                  The most effective way would be to eliminate the cwb, and if the opposition parties defeat the motion, immediately enact it across Canada. Then make a potato marketing board and see Easter squeal.

                  The conservatives could do it, they choose not to. They like wrestling apparently.

                  Comment


                    #33
                    I like that, a marketing board for every one! Quebec grains, hogs, maple syrup, dairy, oops they have gold plated supply management, lumber, minerals, electricity, etc.

                    Comment


                      #34
                      I don't think the conservatives are even wrestling with the snake anymore. Its more like they're making sure it stays well fed.

                      Comment


                        #35
                        Restraint,lol,i just caught myself giving a damn,and
                        quickly put hyde back in the bottle.

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...