Parsley,
Sorry to hear that you are down on science and research. Having dissenting views and results is a normal part of science. Science driven by corporations that have a product to sell or an industry to protect is certainly suspect. But basic research that trys to explain the natural world and how are bodies work have led to some very important discoveries. Making the generalization that all science is biased because of its' funding source is just wrong. Most of the climate research out there is paid for by tax payers. Scientists and science are not perfect. What would you suggest as an alternative to science?
Sorry to hear that you are down on science and research. Having dissenting views and results is a normal part of science. Science driven by corporations that have a product to sell or an industry to protect is certainly suspect. But basic research that trys to explain the natural world and how are bodies work have led to some very important discoveries. Making the generalization that all science is biased because of its' funding source is just wrong. Most of the climate research out there is paid for by tax payers. Scientists and science are not perfect. What would you suggest as an alternative to science?
Comment