http://www.cwbelection.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/2010-DETAILED-FINAL-RESULTS.pdf
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Detailed numbers on the election
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
So when I add it all up there were 11,402 ballots sent back. Of that 5776 of them went to candidate who were clearly in favour of the monopoly.
That works out to 50.6% of total returned ballots for the monopoly. On top of this only something like 41 or 42% of the ballots got returned.
The board and its groupies point to these election results and say, look at how popular the monopoly is with farmers. Let`s be generous and say that 25% of eligible votes went for the single desk. That is hardly a ringing endorsement of anything.
-
According to one of the posters on this site who adamantly supports the board, they only grow 10 - 20 % board crops a year but need the board to market that crop because they are too "busy" on marketing their lentils, chickpeas, canola, peas, etc...
It is obvious that there are many farms out there that are able to grow crops in the exact same way but could care less what the board does with that 10 - 20 % of their production. They don't support the board and are proving it with their drill and couldn't be bothered to even vote one way or the other.
Comment
-
Okay, based on the final ballots
On the single desk side of the equation we have:
Dan Gauthier 786
Stewart Wells 1,872
Allen L. Oberg 1,156
Kyle Korneychuk 1,383
John Sandborn 1,365
Total 6562
On the moderate side we have:
Henry Vos 817
Brian J. Otto 1,558
Vicki A. Dutton 662
Terry V. Youzwa 1,039
Ernie Sirski 692
total 4768
Grand total of 11,330
So monopolists got 57.9 %
moderates got 42.1%
Factor in the 42% return rate on ballots and the monopolists are down to 24% of potential ballots.
Like I said before hardly a ringing endorsement of anything.
Comment
-
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment