If the malt buyers want the farmers to grow it then get it out of the CWB..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
malt barley
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
From the CWB monitor
The latest PROs came out last week and in my view, the barley PROs tell an unfortunate and discouraging story.
The 2 Row malt PRO was lowered by $1.00 while the feed barley pool B was raised by $3.00. This goes counter to everything we’re reading about the global malt barley markets. With the poor quality crop in Canada as well as around the world, the malt premium (over feed price) everywhere else is getting larger – not smaller. For example, I read recently that in Australia, the malt premium is now sitting at $100 over feed, double its traditional level. Here in Canada, the spread between the CWB malt PRO and the CWB feed PRO is now at $27 after starting the year at $58. The malt pool return is going the wrong way.
Here’s the problem.
The CWB has already sold a fair amount of malt barley for this year. And, if you’ve been following the market at all, you will know that the CWB would have sold this tonnage at prices considerably lower than what could be sold today.
Add to that the problem of the crop quality; with the lousy crop this year I’ve heard that there is little more than 700,000 tonnes selected for malt this year, and the CWB does not expect more. Compare that to a typical year of around 2 million tonnes.
So the CWB has sold early and there’s little if anything left to sell at higher prices. In fact, prospects look so bad that there will likely be imports of malt barley into Canada.
The malt PRO is dropping because in earlier PROs the CWB would have factored in expected higher prices to be sold later in the year; now that it’s apparent that they won’t get the barley for these higher priced sales, the PRO needs to be adjusted downward. I expect it to drop even more by the end of the year.
Now complicate this with rising domestic feed barley prices. The current malt premium will erode further if the feed prices continue to rise making it even more difficult to find additional malt barley.
Let’s look at a little history.
In 08-09, the CWB closed the malt pool to any new selections in Jan 2009 – the market price was dropping and the CWB wanted to keep new sales from eroding the pool return. All selections after that point were only offered through Cash Plus contracts, at much lower prices than the pool. Even though it provided lower prices to farmers, CashPlus became the only game in town.
Now, in 10-11, the CWB reported in December: “Going forward, there will be a limited volume of 2010-11 malting barley left to market”. The CWB is sold out and the pool is practically done. Unlike 08-09, the market price is soaring. A CWB official confirmed that there are no CashPlus contracts being offered right now – but if they were, the price would be substantially above both the feed barley price and the malt PRO.
This time, the only game in town is the lower-priced pool. But with bullish feed barley prices and outlooks, and the knowledge that malt prices should be higher, many farmers are likely to opt to sell their barley as domestic feed, effectively starving the pool.
The fact that the CWB is not offering CashPlus contracts tells us a lot about what drivers the CWB is following. CashPlus would not only provide farmers with good prices and signals, it would also make the PRO look lousy. And, if the CWB is short (committed more malt barley than what they’ve been able to select) they will want to make sure any more malt barley that is found covers the CWB’s commitments through the pool – even if it is at a lower price.
If there was ever a year that farmers need good price signals, it’s this year. There is a shortage of good malt barley and providing market prices would be instrumental in finding any additional stocks that are out on the farm. From the farmer’s perspective, it would be valuable to know what his barley is truly worth before dumping it in the feed bin. Unfortunately, from the CWB’s perspective, the best thing is to mute real prices.
Let’s face it – pooling barley in Western Canada simply does not work.
Every year, the CWB struggles to compete with the domestic feed market on feed barley. Some years – like this one – the CWB’s malt pool price struggles to compete with a rising feed barley market. In fact, the way the CWB executed its feed barley export program kept domestic feed barley prices down, and, whether intentional or not, kept feed barley prices from threatening the malt pool.
And now, it’s clear that the CWB can’t afford to offer CashPlus because it needs to protect the failing pool.
The CWB can no longer assume it will obtain the barley it has sold. Because of this and other challenges such as opposing market forces, the CWB is forced to act to protect itself and manage its risk in the malt barley pool account at a considerable expense to producers. The barley producer loses in both price and opportunity. We saw it earlier this year in feed barley, now we’re getting it in spades in malt barley.
It’s time for the new CWB board of directors to face the reality that pooling and the single desk don’t work for barley. The board needs to go to the Federal Government to demand a change in the CWB Act to free barley from the single desk. If that means to have barley farmers vote in a plebiscite, then do it.
Comment
-
Good luck to the cwb to explain this screw up.
You gatta wonder what expertise the board of directors have, when they should have told the salespeople at the cwb that the crop is very late and there is a good chance it will be feed.
Same question as before, what happens to Bruce Burnett and his team of weather and crop experts - nothing.
But let them continue to piss farmers off and see how that works out for the maltsters when they are buying malt from the US or overseas for much higher prices.
Its idiotic.
Comment
-
Similar but they had a crop of higher quality in the bin with durum.
Really makes you question the abilities of the single desk directors.
If they want to run like a government, one person one vote. I want to see what/ how they voted and then hold them accountable.
What do you think the maltsters will be doing to try and get deliveries rather than have good barley be sold as feed.
Comment
-
I don't want to change the channel away from malt barley but....
Did you know....
When the 2009-10 CWB final payments were announced, feed barley wasn’t mentioned in the official release by the CWB. You had to look at the full payment document and go right to the end of the 12 pages to find this statement:
<b>NOTE: Feed Barley Pool A and Pool B received no deliveries so are not shown above.</b>
This is historic. This is the first year ever that the CWB received absolutely no deliveries to the feed barley pools.
Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Nuttin’.
A big goose egg.
How can anyone argue that the CWB adds anything positive to the barley market when malt is a mess and not one farmer out there found anything valuable in the feed barley pools?
And if farmers aren’t taking advantage of pooling, I guess the other pillars – the government guarantee and the single desk – are pretty much of no value to them as well.
I look forward to a rousing debate. Are you around chuckChuck?
Comment
-
Actually wouldn't blame Bruce/his team. The issue is a lot more systemic up the value chain and highlights the concern as to why the CWB is allowed to forward sold when they don't have farmer commitment to deliver or there is no active hedging activity to look after this risk.
Someone suggested over the time the CWB should not be allowed to contract anything without farmers having committed to delivery. Both the maltsters/exporters would have to offer programs that would be acceptable to farmers in the spring (perhaps including an act of god clause) before any new crop business could be done. Would that mean farmers could sign contracts in the spring that are lower priced than at delivery? Absolutely but at least everyone would have known that potential existed.
Comment
-
Questions like this always pose more questions.
Will note the end of crop year presentation in July highlighted the CWB sold 232,000 tonnes of feed barley during the 2009/10 crop year (99,000 tonnes Saudi Arabia and 133,000 tonnes Japan). Will be interesting to know how the CWB secured these supplies and where profits (or losses) went. Annual report material.
[URL="http://www.cwb.ca/public/en/newsroom/releases/pdf/cropyearend2010.pdf"]page 16[/URL]
Comment
-
charliep
You would not blame bruce? Come on, his title is weather and crop survellience. If he doesn't have enough wits about him to point out a drought in Russia and the fact every crop report said the 2010 crop was 4 weeks behind and then tell the cwb the consequences of it, then he really doesn't deserve the paycheck he receives.
But then again neither do any of the bod if they can't use there expertise to determine the influences of a russian drought and a late crop in Canada.
Comment
-
charliep
Your comments about the cwb forward selling without commitments from farmers is a very good one.
Which is exactly what happened with durum. They thought they had a years supply to sell but forgot to check off board prices against their shitty forecasts, also known as PROs, and then realize some of the leftovers were not there anymore.
The director for district 6 wouldn't believe that durum was being made into ethanol. Even though all he had to do was go to terra's website and find durum worth more than the initial price well into the foreseeable future.
Real expertise, just a good bunch of astute farmers running a multi-billion corporation.
And as far as bruce is concerned as a weather and crop guy, he is getting paid alot of money to analyse the past when he should be focused on the impact of both weather and crop reports in the future.
For instance, given the snowfall and the wet areas all over, how to put out an incentive to get farmers to grow board grains when canola is north of 11 bucks for delivery in september? No storage, no stupid contract calls etc.
Just some real cash at harvest.
Comment
-
Articles from this week's emalt.
Begin quote - Australia: Viterra starts construction of a new malthouse in southern Sydney
Canadian grain industry powerhouse, Viterra, has started construction on a new malthouse close to port and rail links in southern Sydney, which could drive further demand for barley in New South Wales, The Land reported on December, 18.
The new Minto plant will increase Viterra’s Australian malt production of 500,000 tonnes – with established plants in Brisbane, Tamworth, Ballarat, South Australia and Western Australia – by 110,000 tonnes.
Viterra Malt already consumes 600,000 tonnes of malting barley – a quarter of the nation’s annual malting barley crop – without factoring in what it will need in pursuit of the growing Chinese and Asia-Pacific brewing. End quote.
The other articles highlight the smaller world barley and the poor quality in traditional malt barley growing regions.
Comment
-
The single most important issue facing the CWB Board of Diretors, who remain in enduring denial, is that the CWB are trying to market grain they don't know if they will or will not get offerred to them:
BECAUSE PRODUCERS HAVE LOST CONFIDENCE IN THE CWB AS A MARKETING INSTITUTIUON.
Read it again, especially the incompetent staff and bewildered group of directors, all in hiding. You have no credibility and farmers are not forced to offer their grain to you and thus don't. Capista?
There should be brown skid marks leading away from 2010's CWB Board table.
Pars
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment